ULNV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DFP Healthcare Acquisitions has a net margin of -- compared to Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat DFP Healthcare Acquisitions's return on equity of --.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DFP Healthcare Acquisitions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Porter Holding International, Inc. has higher upside potential than DFP Healthcare Acquisitions, analysts believe Porter Holding International, Inc. is more attractive than DFP Healthcare Acquisitions.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DFP Healthcare Acquisitions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DFP Healthcare Acquisitions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Porter Holding International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DFP Healthcare Acquisitions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Porter Holding International, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DFP Healthcare Acquisitions quarterly revenues of --. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than DFP Healthcare Acquisitions's net income of --. Notably, Porter Holding International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DFP Healthcare Acquisitions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Porter Holding International, Inc. is 6,647.39x versus -- for DFP Healthcare Acquisitions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LAMY has a net margin of -- compared to Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net margin of -104.27%. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat LAMY's return on equity of --.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LAMY has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Porter Holding International, Inc. has higher upside potential than LAMY, analysts believe Porter Holding International, Inc. is more attractive than LAMY.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LAMY has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LAMY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Porter Holding International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LAMY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Porter Holding International, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LAMY quarterly revenues of $3.8K. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than LAMY's net income of $61.8K. Notably, Porter Holding International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LAMY's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Porter Holding International, Inc. is 6,647.39x versus 91.85x for LAMY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Learning Tree International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Learning Tree International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Learning Tree International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Porter Holding International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Learning Tree International, Inc., analysts believe Porter Holding International, Inc. is more attractive than Learning Tree International, Inc..

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Learning Tree International, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.088%.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Learning Tree International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Porter Holding International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Learning Tree International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Porter Holding International, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Learning Tree International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Learning Tree International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Porter Holding International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Learning Tree International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Porter Holding International, Inc. is 6,647.39x versus 0.15x for Learning Tree International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skillsoft Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net margin of -32%. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Skillsoft Corp.'s return on equity of -207.51%.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skillsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 597.35%. Given that Skillsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Porter Holding International, Inc., analysts believe Skillsoft Corp. is more attractive than Porter Holding International, Inc..

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a beta of 0.104, which suggesting that the stock is 89.648% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skillsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.731, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.132%.

Porter Holding International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skillsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Porter Holding International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skillsoft Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Porter Holding International, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Skillsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $129M. Porter Holding International, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Skillsoft Corp.'s net income of -$41.3M. Notably, Porter Holding International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Skillsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Porter Holding International, Inc. is 6,647.39x versus 0.12x for Skillsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.