TIPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net margin of -55.83%. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity of -257.58%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 180164982.39%. Given that Hyperscale Data, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc., analysts believe Hyperscale Data, Inc. is more attractive than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc..

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a beta of -8.855, which suggesting that the stock is 985.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a beta of 2.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.109%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc. pays out 8.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.3M. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. is 54.64x versus 0.04x for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net margin of 13.81%. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.64%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mueller Water Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 12.28%. Given that Mueller Water Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc., analysts believe Mueller Water Products, Inc. is more attractive than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc..

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a beta of -8.855, which suggesting that the stock is 985.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products, Inc. has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.498%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products, Inc. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products, Inc. pays out 22.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $380.8M. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s net income of $52.6M. Notably, Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mueller Water Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. is 54.64x versus 2.71x for Mueller Water Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net margin of 14.98%. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Omega Flex, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.08%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Omega Flex, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, Inc., analysts believe Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. is more attractive than Omega Flex, Inc..

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a beta of -8.855, which suggesting that the stock is 985.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex, Inc. has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.264%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Omega Flex, Inc. offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc. pays out 75.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Omega Flex, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.2M. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Omega Flex, Inc.'s net income of $3.6M. Notably, Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Omega Flex, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. is 54.64x versus 2.86x for Omega Flex, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net margin of -4.01%. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.28%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.14%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc., analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc..

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a beta of -8.855, which suggesting that the stock is 985.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.907%.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. pays out 174.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $85.1M. Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tianrong Internet Products & Services, Inc. is 54.64x versus 0.84x for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.