TCNNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bruker has a net margin of -21.18% compared to Trulieve Cannabis's net margin of 4.73%. Trulieve Cannabis's return on equity of -9.3% beat Bruker's return on equity of 19.61%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 351.59%. On the other hand Bruker has an analysts' consensus of $74.01 which suggests that it could grow by 29.77%. Given that Trulieve Cannabis has higher upside potential than Bruker, analysts believe Trulieve Cannabis is more attractive than Bruker.

Trulieve Cannabis has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.69% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.733%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Trulieve Cannabis pays -0.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker pays out 6.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trulieve Cannabis quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Bruker quarterly revenues of $864.4M. Trulieve Cannabis's net income of -$60.2M is lower than Bruker's net income of $40.9M. Notably, Trulieve Cannabis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker's PE ratio is 27.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trulieve Cannabis is 0.78x versus 2.60x for Bruker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Karyopharm Therapeutics has a net margin of -21.18% compared to Trulieve Cannabis's net margin of -82.7%. Trulieve Cannabis's return on equity of -9.3% beat Karyopharm Therapeutics's return on equity of --.

Trulieve Cannabis has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 351.59%. On the other hand Karyopharm Therapeutics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 598%. Given that Karyopharm Therapeutics has higher upside potential than Trulieve Cannabis, analysts believe Karyopharm Therapeutics is more attractive than Trulieve Cannabis.

Trulieve Cannabis has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.69% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karyopharm Therapeutics has a beta of 0.048, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.17%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Karyopharm Therapeutics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trulieve Cannabis pays -0.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Karyopharm Therapeutics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trulieve Cannabis quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than Karyopharm Therapeutics quarterly revenues of $38.8M. Trulieve Cannabis's net income of -$60.2M is lower than Karyopharm Therapeutics's net income of -$32.1M. Notably, Trulieve Cannabis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Karyopharm Therapeutics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trulieve Cannabis is 0.78x versus 0.55x for Karyopharm Therapeutics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -21.18% compared to Trulieve Cannabis's net margin of -49.65%. Trulieve Cannabis's return on equity of -9.3% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 351.59%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 602.96%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Trulieve Cannabis, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Trulieve Cannabis.

Trulieve Cannabis has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.69% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.383%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trulieve Cannabis pays -0.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trulieve Cannabis quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Trulieve Cannabis's net income of -$60.2M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Trulieve Cannabis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trulieve Cannabis is 0.78x versus 0.06x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -21.18% compared to Trulieve Cannabis's net margin of -2357.27%. Trulieve Cannabis's return on equity of -9.3% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Trulieve Cannabis has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 351.59%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1656.38%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Trulieve Cannabis, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Trulieve Cannabis.

Trulieve Cannabis has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.69% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Trulieve Cannabis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trulieve Cannabis pays -0.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trulieve Cannabis quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Trulieve Cannabis's net income of -$60.2M is lower than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Trulieve Cannabis's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trulieve Cannabis is 0.78x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.