TCEHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baidu has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 22.74%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Baidu's return on equity of 7.86%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baidu has an analysts' consensus of $110.40 which suggests that it could grow by 28.6%. Given that Baidu has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Baidu is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baidu has a beta of 0.463, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.728%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Baidu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Baidu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Baidu quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than Baidu's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while Baidu's PE ratio is 10.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.96x versus 1.62x for Baidu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bilibili has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of -1.09%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat Bilibili's return on equity of -19.15%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bilibili has an analysts' consensus of $23.61 which suggests that it could grow by 20.53%. Given that Bilibili has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Bilibili is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.847%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Bilibili offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Bilibili quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than Bilibili's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while Bilibili's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.96x versus 2.30x for Bilibili. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQIYI has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 3.17%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat iQIYI's return on equity of 11.31%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iQIYI has an analysts' consensus of $2.65 which suggests that it could grow by 29.24%. Given that iQIYI has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe iQIYI is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI has a beta of 0.017, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.307%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. iQIYI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than iQIYI quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than iQIYI's net income of $32M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while iQIYI's PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.96x versus 0.47x for iQIYI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetEase has a net margin of 31.84% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 24.95%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75% beat NetEase's return on equity of 21.01%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NetEase has an analysts' consensus of $113.52 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetEase has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.972%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. NetEase offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase pays out 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than NetEase quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B is higher than NetEase's net income of $913.2M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while NetEase's PE ratio is 15.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 5.96x versus 4.06x for NetEase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.