TAGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NOV, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tristar Acquisition Group's net margin of -3.56%. Tristar Acquisition Group's return on equity of -- beat NOV, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.34%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NOV, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.55 which suggests that it could fall by -4.12%. Given that NOV, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tristar Acquisition Group, analysts believe NOV, Inc. is more attractive than Tristar Acquisition Group.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a beta of 4.143, which suggesting that the stock is 314.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOV, Inc. has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.584%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOV, Inc. offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tristar Acquisition Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV, Inc. pays out 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. NOV, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tristar Acquisition Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NOV, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Tristar Acquisition Group's net income of -- is lower than NOV, Inc.'s net income of -$81M. Notably, Tristar Acquisition Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NOV, Inc.'s PE ratio is 54.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tristar Acquisition Group is -- versus 0.87x for NOV, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NPK International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tristar Acquisition Group's net margin of 8.81%. Tristar Acquisition Group's return on equity of -- beat NPK International, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.19%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NPK International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that NPK International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tristar Acquisition Group, analysts believe NPK International, Inc. is more attractive than Tristar Acquisition Group.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a beta of 4.143, which suggesting that the stock is 314.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NPK International, Inc. has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.096%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NPK International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tristar Acquisition Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NPK International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tristar Acquisition Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NPK International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $68.8M. Tristar Acquisition Group's net income of -- is lower than NPK International, Inc.'s net income of $6.1M. Notably, Tristar Acquisition Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NPK International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 38.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tristar Acquisition Group is -- versus 4.84x for NPK International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oil States International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tristar Acquisition Group's net margin of -65.7%. Tristar Acquisition Group's return on equity of -- beat Oil States International, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.53%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oil States International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could fall by -32.16%. Given that Oil States International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tristar Acquisition Group, analysts believe Oil States International, Inc. is more attractive than Tristar Acquisition Group.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a beta of 4.143, which suggesting that the stock is 314.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oil States International, Inc. has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.929%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oil States International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tristar Acquisition Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oil States International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tristar Acquisition Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oil States International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $178.5M. Tristar Acquisition Group's net income of -- is lower than Oil States International, Inc.'s net income of -$117.2M. Notably, Tristar Acquisition Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oil States International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 97.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tristar Acquisition Group is -- versus 1.10x for Oil States International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cactus, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Tristar Acquisition Group's net margin of 19.01%. Tristar Acquisition Group's return on equity of -- beat Cactus, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.16%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cactus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $51.50 which suggests that it could fall by -11.88%. Given that Cactus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tristar Acquisition Group, analysts believe Cactus, Inc. is more attractive than Tristar Acquisition Group.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a beta of 4.143, which suggesting that the stock is 314.298% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cactus, Inc. has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.041%.

Tristar Acquisition Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cactus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Tristar Acquisition Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cactus, Inc. pays out 18.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cactus, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tristar Acquisition Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cactus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $264M. Tristar Acquisition Group's net income of -- is lower than Cactus, Inc.'s net income of $50.2M. Notably, Tristar Acquisition Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cactus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tristar Acquisition Group is -- versus 3.85x for Cactus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.