Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
19
SMFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0100
Seasonality move
:
-49.38%
Day range:
$0.0051 - $0.0051
52-week range:
$0.0000 - $0.0899
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.00x
P/B ratio:
0.00x
Volume:
2.2K
Avg. volume:
14.1K
1-year change:
-74%
Market cap:
$300
Revenue:
$8.2M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMFL
Smart for Life, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVOZ
Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLLB
Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBIS
Home Bistro, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLBLF
Altus Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTCFQ
Tattooed Chef, Inc.
|
$65.2M | -$0.17 | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMFL
Smart for Life, Inc.
|
$0.0025 | -- | $300 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
AVOZ
Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
BLLB
Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.0006 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HBIS
Home Bistro, Inc.
|
$0.0002 | -- | $200 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
PLBLF
Altus Copper Corp.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $100 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
TTCFQ
Tattooed Chef, Inc.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $100 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMFL
Smart for Life, Inc.
|
-- | 120.328 | -- | -- |
|
AVOZ
Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.
|
-- | 190.548 | -- | -- |
|
BLLB
Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -2.054 | -- | -- |
|
HBIS
Home Bistro, Inc.
|
-- | -204.849 | -- | -- |
|
PLBLF
Altus Copper Corp.
|
-- | 2.932 | -- | -- |
|
TTCFQ
Tattooed Chef, Inc.
|
-- | -553.002 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMFL
Smart for Life, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVOZ
Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLLB
Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBIS
Home Bistro, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLBLF
Altus Copper Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTCFQ
Tattooed Chef, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Smart for Life, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMFL or AVOZ?
Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Smart for Life, Inc.'s net margin of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.-- -- -- AVOZAltavoz Entertainment, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMFL or AVOZ?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart for Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Altavoz Entertainment, Inc., analysts believe Smart for Life, Inc. is more attractive than Altavoz Entertainment, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0 0 0 AVOZAltavoz Entertainment, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SMFL or AVOZ More Risky?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 18.602, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1760.238%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMFL or AVOZ?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart for Life, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMFL or AVOZ?
Smart for Life, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Altavoz Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Smart for Life, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart for Life, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Altavoz Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0.00x -- -- -- AVOZAltavoz Entertainment, Inc.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMFL or BLLB?
Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Smart for Life, Inc.'s net margin of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.-- -- -- BLLBBell Buckle Holdings, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMFL or BLLB?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart for Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Smart for Life, Inc. is more attractive than Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0 0 0 BLLBBell Buckle Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SMFL or BLLB More Risky?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -3.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 460.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMFL or BLLB?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart for Life, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMFL or BLLB?
Smart for Life, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Smart for Life, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart for Life, Inc. is 0.00x versus -- for Bell Buckle Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0.00x -- -- -- BLLBBell Buckle Holdings, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMFL or HBIS?
Home Bistro, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Smart for Life, Inc.'s net margin of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Home Bistro, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.-- -- -- HBISHome Bistro, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMFL or HBIS?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Home Bistro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart for Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Home Bistro, Inc., analysts believe Smart for Life, Inc. is more attractive than Home Bistro, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0 0 0 HBISHome Bistro, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SMFL or HBIS More Risky?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Home Bistro, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.734%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMFL or HBIS?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Home Bistro, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart for Life, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Home Bistro, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMFL or HBIS?
Smart for Life, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Home Bistro, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Home Bistro, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Smart for Life, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Home Bistro, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart for Life, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Home Bistro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0.00x -- -- -- HBISHome Bistro, Inc.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMFL or PLBLF?
Altus Copper Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Smart for Life, Inc.'s net margin of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Altus Copper Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.-- -- -- PLBLFAltus Copper Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMFL or PLBLF?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Altus Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart for Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Altus Copper Corp., analysts believe Smart for Life, Inc. is more attractive than Altus Copper Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0 0 0 PLBLFAltus Copper Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SMFL or PLBLF More Risky?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altus Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMFL or PLBLF?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altus Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart for Life, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altus Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMFL or PLBLF?
Smart for Life, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Altus Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Altus Copper Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Smart for Life, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altus Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart for Life, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Altus Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0.00x -- -- -- PLBLFAltus Copper Corp.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMFL or TTCFQ?
Tattooed Chef, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Smart for Life, Inc.'s net margin of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Tattooed Chef, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.-- -- -- TTCFQTattooed Chef, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMFL or TTCFQ?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tattooed Chef, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59999900%. Given that Tattooed Chef, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smart for Life, Inc., analysts believe Tattooed Chef, Inc. is more attractive than Smart for Life, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0 0 0 TTCFQTattooed Chef, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SMFL or TTCFQ More Risky?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tattooed Chef, Inc. has a beta of -37.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3895.669%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMFL or TTCFQ?
Smart for Life, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tattooed Chef, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart for Life, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tattooed Chef, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMFL or TTCFQ?
Smart for Life, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tattooed Chef, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Smart for Life, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Tattooed Chef, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Smart for Life, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tattooed Chef, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart for Life, Inc. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Tattooed Chef, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMFLSmart for Life, Inc.0.00x -- -- -- TTCFQTattooed Chef, Inc.0.00x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
