Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
86
SITIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.85
Seasonality move
:
357.38%
Day range:
$3.85 - $3.85
52-week range:
$2.12 - $4.10
Dividend yield:
8.99%
P/E ratio:
7.47x
P/S ratio:
3.02x
P/B ratio:
3.76x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
8.7K
1-year change:
68.49%
Market cap:
$10.3B
Revenue:
$3.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.50
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SITIF
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SITIF
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$3.85 | -- | $10.3B | 7.47x | $0.09 | 8.99% | 3.02x |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$1.69 | -- | $266.3M | 88.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.40x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
$2.42 | -- | $5.9M | 11.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.06x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
$0.92 | -- | $46.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SITIF
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
6.49% | 0.367 | -- | 1.79x |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
0.83% | -0.989 | 0.02% | 0.89x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-42.14% | 1.065 | -- | 0.40x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
69.75% | -0.556 | -- | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SITIF
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 44.21% | 47.69% | -- | -- |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$312K | $20.8K | 15.18% | 15.6% | 2.68% | -$13.5K |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.67% | -103.07% | -- | -- |
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SITIF or CRE?
Cre8 Enterprise has a net margin of -- compared to SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.69% beat Cre8 Enterprise's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $2.6B CRECre8 Enterprise-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SITIF or CRE?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cre8 Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cre8 Enterprise, analysts believe SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Cre8 Enterprise.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CRECre8 Enterprise0 0 0 -
Is SITIF or CRE More Risky?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cre8 Enterprise has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SITIF or CRE?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.99%. Cre8 Enterprise offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 69.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Cre8 Enterprise pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SITIF or CRE?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cre8 Enterprise quarterly revenues of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Cre8 Enterprise's net income of --. Notably, SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Cre8 Enterprise's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is 3.02x versus -- for Cre8 Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.3.02x 7.47x -- -- CRECre8 Enterprise-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SITIF or KUBR?
Kuber Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 1.25%. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.69% beat Kuber Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $2.6B KUBRKuber Resources Corp.40.25% $0.00 $25M -
What do Analysts Say About SITIF or KUBR?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuber Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kuber Resources Corp., analysts believe SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Kuber Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 KUBRKuber Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SITIF or KUBR More Risky?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuber Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.271%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SITIF or KUBR?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.99%. Kuber Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 69.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuber Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SITIF or KUBR?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuber Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $775.2K. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kuber Resources Corp.'s net income of $9.7K. Notably, SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Kuber Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 88.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is 3.02x versus 21.40x for Kuber Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.3.02x 7.47x -- -- KUBRKuber Resources Corp.21.40x 88.95x $775.2K $9.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SITIF or PMAX?
Powell Max Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.69% beat Powell Max Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $2.6B PMAXPowell Max Ltd.-- -- -$1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SITIF or PMAX?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Powell Max Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Powell Max Ltd., analysts believe SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Powell Max Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SITIF or PMAX More Risky?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Max Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SITIF or PMAX?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.99%. Powell Max Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 69.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Max Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SITIF or PMAX?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Powell Max Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Powell Max Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Powell Max Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is 3.02x versus 1.06x for Powell Max Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.3.02x 7.47x -- -- PMAXPowell Max Ltd.1.06x 11.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SITIF or SFHG?
Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a net margin of -- compared to SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.69% beat Samfine Creation Holdings Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $2.6B SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SITIF or SFHG?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samfine Creation Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Samfine Creation Holdings Group, analysts believe SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Samfine Creation Holdings Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is SITIF or SFHG More Risky?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SITIF or SFHG?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.99%. Samfine Creation Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 69.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Samfine Creation Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SITIF or SFHG?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Samfine Creation Holdings Group quarterly revenues of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Samfine Creation Holdings Group's net income of --. Notably, SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while Samfine Creation Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is 3.02x versus -- for Samfine Creation Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.3.02x 7.47x -- -- SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SITIF or USPCY?
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.69% beat China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -103.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $2.6B USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.-- -- $89.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SITIF or USPCY?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd., analysts believe SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SITIF or USPCY More Risky?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SITIF or USPCY?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.99%. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 69.89% of its earnings as a dividend. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SITIF or USPCY?
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.47x while China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. is 3.02x versus 0.90x for China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SITIFSITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.3.02x 7.47x -- -- USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0.90x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
