Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
50
SIOLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.21
Seasonality move
:
-9.86%
Day range:
$0.22 - $0.22
52-week range:
$0.18 - $0.68
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.05x
P/B ratio:
1.65x
Volume:
188
Avg. volume:
368
1-year change:
-66.04%
Market cap:
$113.3M
Revenue:
$3.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.61
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOLY
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEKE
KE Holdings, Inc.
|
$3.2B | $0.13 | -27.02% | 99.4% | $20.46 |
|
DUO
Fangdd Network Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRRE
Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UK
Ucommune International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOLY
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.22 | -- | $113.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
BEKE
KE Holdings, Inc.
|
$17.38 | $20.46 | $20.2B | 42.12x | $0.36 | 2.07% | 1.41x |
|
DUO
Fangdd Network Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.
|
$2.28 | -- | $427.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.33x |
|
SRRE
Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.
|
$0.1300 | -- | $8.9M | 7.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
UK
Ucommune International Ltd.
|
$0.73 | -- | $1.6M | 0.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOLY
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.
|
115.19% | -0.248 | -- | 0.34x |
|
BEKE
KE Holdings, Inc.
|
23.72% | -0.537 | 13.7% | 1.45x |
|
DUO
Fangdd Network Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.
|
78.31% | 1.063 | -- | 0.15x |
|
SRRE
Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.
|
1.2% | -1.116 | -71.58% | 0.61x |
|
UK
Ucommune International Ltd.
|
58.2% | 0.284 | 213.97% | 0.42x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOLY
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.29% | -158.2% | -- | -- |
|
BEKE
KE Holdings, Inc.
|
$689.5M | $96.8M | 3.78% | 4.97% | 3% | $115.2M |
|
DUO
Fangdd Network Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.01% | -34.33% | -- | -- |
|
SRRE
Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.
|
-$75.4K | -$1.1M | -8.66% | -8.78% | -122.58% | $3.9M |
|
UK
Ucommune International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.85% | -36.07% | -- | -- |
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOLY or BEKE?
KE Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 3.24%. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -158.2% beat KE Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $13.2B BEKEKE Holdings, Inc.21.41% $0.09 $12.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOLY or BEKE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KE Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.46 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that KE Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe KE Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 BEKEKE Holdings, Inc.14 3 0 -
Is SIOLY or BEKE More Risky?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KE Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.218%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOLY or BEKE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KE Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KE Holdings, Inc. pays out 64.72% of its earnings as a dividend. KE Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOLY or BEKE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KE Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than KE Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $104.3M. Notably, Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KE Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.05x versus 1.41x for KE Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- BEKEKE Holdings, Inc.1.41x 42.12x $3.2B $104.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOLY or DUO?
Fangdd Network Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -158.2% beat Fangdd Network Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $13.2B DUOFangdd Network Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SIOLY or DUO?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fangdd Network Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fangdd Network Group, analysts believe Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Fangdd Network Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 DUOFangdd Network Group0 0 0 -
Is SIOLY or DUO More Risky?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fangdd Network Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOLY or DUO?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fangdd Network Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fangdd Network Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOLY or DUO?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fangdd Network Group quarterly revenues of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Fangdd Network Group's net income of --. Notably, Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fangdd Network Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.05x versus -- for Fangdd Network Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- DUOFangdd Network Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOLY or GZUHY?
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -158.2% beat Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $13.2B GZUHYGuangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.-- -- $21.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOLY or GZUHY?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GZUHYGuangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOLY or GZUHY More Risky?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOLY or GZUHY?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOLY or GZUHY?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.05x versus 0.33x for Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- GZUHYGuangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.0.33x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOLY or SRRE?
Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -9.34%. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -158.2% beat Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $13.2B SRRESunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.-8.14% $0.07 $103.1M -
What do Analysts Say About SIOLY or SRRE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc., analysts believe Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SRRESunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SIOLY or SRRE More Risky?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOLY or SRRE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOLY or SRRE?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $926.9K. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.05x versus 0.62x for Sunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- SRRESunrise Real Estate Group, Inc.0.62x 7.88x $926.9K $4.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOLY or UK?
Ucommune International Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -158.2% beat Ucommune International Ltd.'s return on equity of -36.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $13.2B UKUcommune International Ltd.-- -- $11.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SIOLY or UK?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucommune International Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ucommune International Ltd., analysts believe Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Ucommune International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 UKUcommune International Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOLY or UK More Risky?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.793% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucommune International Ltd. has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.004000000000004%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOLY or UK?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ucommune International Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ucommune International Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOLY or UK?
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ucommune International Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Ucommune International Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ucommune International Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.05x versus 0.09x for Ucommune International Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOLYSino-Ocean Group Holdings Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- UKUcommune International Ltd.0.09x 0.61x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 25.79% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 7.34% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is down 12.95% over the past day.
