SHWDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -3.73% compared to Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 20.71%. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 1.86% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.64%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe Resonac Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd..

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.257%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Resonac Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$87M is lower than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $873.2M. Notably, Resonac Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.43x while Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings Corp. is 1.10x versus 3.81x for Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -3.73% compared to Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 8.71%. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 1.86% beat Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.86%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe Resonac Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd..

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.368%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Resonac Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4B. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$87M is lower than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $345.4M. Notably, Resonac Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.43x while Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings Corp. is 1.10x versus 0.35x for Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -3.73% compared to Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 7.53%. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 1.86% beat Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.11%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd., analysts believe Resonac Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd..

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.528%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Resonac Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. pays out 44.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $367.8M. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$87M is lower than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s net income of $27.7M. Notably, Resonac Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.43x while Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings Corp. is 1.10x versus 0.59x for Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has a net margin of -3.73% compared to Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 7.88%. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 1.86% beat Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s return on equity of 7.95%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Taiheiyo Cement Corp., analysts believe Resonac Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Taiheiyo Cement Corp..

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.041%.

Resonac Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taiheiyo Cement Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Resonac Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement Corp. pays out 10.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Taiheiyo Cement Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Resonac Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$87M is lower than Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s net income of $121.3M. Notably, Resonac Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 139.43x while Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings Corp. is 1.10x versus 0.51x for Taiheiyo Cement Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.