SHWDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shin-Etsu Chemical has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Resonac Holdings's net margin of --. Resonac Holdings's return on equity of 6.18% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical's return on equity of --.

Resonac Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical, analysts believe Resonac Holdings is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical.

Resonac Holdings has a beta of 0.403, which suggesting that the stock is 59.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.195%.

Resonac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shin-Etsu Chemical offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Resonac Holdings pays -62.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Resonac Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Shin-Etsu Chemical quarterly revenues of --. Resonac Holdings's net income of $83M is higher than Shin-Etsu Chemical's net income of --. Notably, Resonac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while Shin-Etsu Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings is 0.52x versus 5.92x for Shin-Etsu Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Chemical has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Resonac Holdings's net margin of 3.98%. Resonac Holdings's return on equity of 6.18% beat Sumitomo Chemical's return on equity of -21.18%.

Resonac Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Chemical, analysts believe Resonac Holdings is more attractive than Sumitomo Chemical.

Resonac Holdings has a beta of 0.403, which suggesting that the stock is 59.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Chemical has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.583%.

Resonac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sumitomo Chemical offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Resonac Holdings pays -62.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Chemical pays out -6.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Resonac Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Chemical quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Resonac Holdings's net income of $83M is lower than Sumitomo Chemical's net income of $156.4M. Notably, Resonac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while Sumitomo Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.21x for Sumitomo Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Resonac Holdings's net margin of 1.29%. Resonac Holdings's return on equity of 6.18% beat Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 8.09%.

Resonac Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Osaka Cement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Osaka Cement, analysts believe Resonac Holdings is more attractive than Sumitomo Osaka Cement.

Resonac Holdings has a beta of 0.403, which suggesting that the stock is 59.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Resonac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Resonac Holdings pays -62.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays out 26.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues of $341.4M. Resonac Holdings's net income of $83M is higher than Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Resonac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while Sumitomo Osaka Cement's PE ratio is 12.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.59x for Sumitomo Osaka Cement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiheiyo Cement has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Resonac Holdings's net margin of 6.48%. Resonac Holdings's return on equity of 6.18% beat Taiheiyo Cement's return on equity of 7.55%.

Resonac Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiheiyo Cement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resonac Holdings has higher upside potential than Taiheiyo Cement, analysts believe Resonac Holdings is more attractive than Taiheiyo Cement.

Resonac Holdings has a beta of 0.403, which suggesting that the stock is 59.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiheiyo Cement has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.609%.

Resonac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taiheiyo Cement offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Resonac Holdings pays -62.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement pays out 18.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resonac Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Taiheiyo Cement quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Resonac Holdings's net income of $83M is lower than Taiheiyo Cement's net income of $86.8M. Notably, Resonac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.86x while Taiheiyo Cement's PE ratio is 8.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resonac Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.50x for Taiheiyo Cement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.