Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
55
SECYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.80
Seasonality move
:
7.26%
Day range:
$12.80 - $12.82
52-week range:
$8.50 - $15.16
Dividend yield:
2.23%
P/E ratio:
40.57x
P/S ratio:
0.41x
P/B ratio:
5.01x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
66K
1-year change:
15.16%
Market cap:
$2.8B
Revenue:
$7.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SECYF
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
|
$296.1M | -- | -85.16% | -- | -- |
|
BCHT
Birchtech Corp.
|
$5.4M | -$0.01 | -14.3% | -40.48% | $3.00 |
|
GFL
GFL Environmental, Inc.
|
$1.2B | $0.19 | -14.96% | -9.97% | $56.38 |
|
MCIM
Macau Capital Investments, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$4.3B | $1.78 | 4.16% | -0.5% | $246.21 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SECYF
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
|
$12.80 | -- | $2.8B | 40.57x | $0.07 | 2.23% | 0.41x |
|
BCHT
Birchtech Corp.
|
$0.80 | $3.00 | $77.5M | 19.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.05x |
|
GFL
GFL Environmental, Inc.
|
$43.24 | $56.38 | $15B | 7.97x | $0.02 | 0.14% | 3.36x |
|
MCIM
Macau Capital Investments, Inc.
|
$0.0005 | -- | $2.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.80x |
|
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
|
$0.0408 | -- | $5.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$213.20 | $246.21 | $66B | 31.69x | $0.63 | 1.11% | 4.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SECYF
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
|
56.67% | 0.705 | 23.43% | 0.89x |
|
BCHT
Birchtech Corp.
|
-31.7% | 2.223 | 0.39% | 0.49x |
|
GFL
GFL Environmental, Inc.
|
50.85% | -0.586 | 32.99% | 0.55x |
|
MCIM
Macau Capital Investments, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
|
-- | -1.798 | -- | 0.00x |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
53.22% | -0.256 | 19.22% | 0.48x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SECYF
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
|
$77M | $52.3M | 6.17% | 11.08% | 2.91% | $10.8M |
|
BCHT
Birchtech Corp.
|
$4M | $810.8K | -2086.14% | -895.28% | 11.01% | $314.2K |
|
GFL
GFL Environmental, Inc.
|
$268.8M | $121.2M | -0.13% | -0.28% | 9.85% | $222.7M |
|
MCIM
Macau Capital Investments, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QWTR
Quest Water Global, Inc.
|
-- | -$198.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$244K |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $839M | 8.48% | 18.1% | 19.92% | $737M |
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SECYF or BCHT?
Birchtech Corp. has a net margin of 0.04% compared to Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net margin of 10.7%. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s return on equity of 11.08% beat Birchtech Corp.'s return on equity of -895.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.4.29% $0.00 $1.3B BCHTBirchtech Corp.54.03% $0.01 -$866.9K -
What do Analysts Say About SECYF or BCHT?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birchtech Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 275%. Given that Birchtech Corp. has higher upside potential than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp., analysts believe Birchtech Corp. is more attractive than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0 0 0 BCHTBirchtech Corp.1 0 0 -
Is SECYF or BCHT More Risky?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birchtech Corp. has a beta of 2.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.67%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SECYF or BCHT?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Birchtech Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. pays 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Birchtech Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SECYF or BCHT?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Birchtech Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net income of $726K is lower than Birchtech Corp.'s net income of $788K. Notably, Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.57x while Birchtech Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is 0.41x versus 4.05x for Birchtech Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0.41x 40.57x $1.8B $726K BCHTBirchtech Corp.4.05x 19.25x $7.4M $788K
-
Which has Higher Returns SECYF or GFL?
GFL Environmental, Inc. has a net margin of 0.04% compared to Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net margin of 6.38%. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s return on equity of 11.08% beat GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.4.29% $0.00 $1.3B GFLGFL Environmental, Inc.21.85% $0.22 $11.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SECYF or GFL?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.38 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0 0 0 GFLGFL Environmental, Inc.11 4 0 -
Is SECYF or GFL More Risky?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.349%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SECYF or GFL?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. GFL Environmental, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. pays 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays out 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SECYF or GFL?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net income of $726K is lower than GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $78.5M. Notably, Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.57x while GFL Environmental, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is 0.41x versus 3.36x for GFL Environmental, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0.41x 40.57x $1.8B $726K GFLGFL Environmental, Inc.3.36x 7.97x $1.2B $78.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SECYF or MCIM?
Macau Capital Investments, Inc. has a net margin of 0.04% compared to Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net margin of --. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s return on equity of 11.08% beat Macau Capital Investments, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.4.29% $0.00 $1.3B MCIMMacau Capital Investments, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SECYF or MCIM?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macau Capital Investments, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has higher upside potential than Macau Capital Investments, Inc., analysts believe Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is more attractive than Macau Capital Investments, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0 0 0 MCIMMacau Capital Investments, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SECYF or MCIM More Risky?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macau Capital Investments, Inc. has a beta of -0.068, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.839%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SECYF or MCIM?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Macau Capital Investments, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. pays 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Macau Capital Investments, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SECYF or MCIM?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Macau Capital Investments, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net income of $726K is higher than Macau Capital Investments, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.57x while Macau Capital Investments, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is 0.41x versus 0.80x for Macau Capital Investments, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0.41x 40.57x $1.8B $726K MCIMMacau Capital Investments, Inc.0.80x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SECYF or QWTR?
Quest Water Global, Inc. has a net margin of 0.04% compared to Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net margin of --. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s return on equity of 11.08% beat Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.4.29% $0.00 $1.3B QWTRQuest Water Global, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$2.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SECYF or QWTR?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Water Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, Inc., analysts believe Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is more attractive than Quest Water Global, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0 0 0 QWTRQuest Water Global, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SECYF or QWTR More Risky?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SECYF or QWTR?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Quest Water Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. pays 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SECYF or QWTR?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net income of $726K is higher than Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K. Notably, Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.57x while Quest Water Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is 0.41x versus -- for Quest Water Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0.41x 40.57x $1.8B $726K QWTRQuest Water Global, Inc.-- -- -- -$198.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns SECYF or RSG?
Republic Services, Inc. has a net margin of 0.04% compared to Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net margin of 13.06%. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s return on equity of 11.08% beat Republic Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.4.29% $0.00 $1.3B RSGRepublic Services, Inc.29.94% $1.76 $25.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SECYF or RSG?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Republic Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.21 which suggests that it could grow by 15.29%. Given that Republic Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp., analysts believe Republic Services, Inc. is more attractive than Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0 0 0 RSGRepublic Services, Inc.14 9 0 -
Is SECYF or RSG More Risky?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.66% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.574%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SECYF or RSG?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Republic Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. pays 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc. pays out 34.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SECYF or RSG?
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Republic Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s net income of $726K is lower than Republic Services, Inc.'s net income of $550M. Notably, Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.57x while Republic Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp. is 0.41x versus 4.05x for Republic Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SECYFSecure Waste Infrastructure Corp.0.41x 40.57x $1.8B $726K RSGRepublic Services, Inc.4.05x 31.69x $4.2B $550M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
