SCFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Angi, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.99%. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Angi, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.41%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Angi, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.88%. Given that Angi, Inc. has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Angi, Inc. is more attractive than Security First International Holdings, Inc..

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angi, Inc. has a beta of 1.740, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.024%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Angi, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angi, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Angi, Inc. quarterly revenues of $265.6M. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Angi, Inc.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angi, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings, Inc. is 18,176.91x versus 2.11x for Angi, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.83%. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.84%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IZEA Worldwide, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 37.48%. Given that IZEA Worldwide, Inc. has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, Inc., analysts believe IZEA Worldwide, Inc. is more attractive than Security First International Holdings, Inc..

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IZEA Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.237%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IZEA Worldwide, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IZEA Worldwide, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IZEA Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.1M. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of $147.7K. Notably, Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings, Inc. is 18,176.91x versus 2.38x for IZEA Worldwide, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -65.3%. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lendway, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.24%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendway, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security First International Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lendway, Inc., analysts believe Security First International Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lendway, Inc..

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.297%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendway, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Lendway, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings, Inc. is 18,176.91x versus 0.14x for Lendway, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.99%. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ziff Davis, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.15%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ziff Davis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 23.31%. Given that Ziff Davis, Inc. has higher upside potential than Security First International Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Ziff Davis, Inc. is more attractive than Security First International Holdings, Inc..

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis, Inc. has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.852%.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security First International Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Security First International Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ziff Davis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $363.7M. Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Ziff Davis, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Security First International Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security First International Holdings, Inc. is 18,176.91x versus 1.05x for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.