RYCEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KNOT Offshore Partners LP has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of -4.95%. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat KNOT Offshore Partners LP's return on equity of -2.39%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KNOT Offshore Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.29%. Given that KNOT Offshore Partners LP has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe KNOT Offshore Partners LP is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.376% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KNOT Offshore Partners LP has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.5%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KNOT Offshore Partners LP offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KNOT Offshore Partners LP pays out -30.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KNOT Offshore Partners LP quarterly revenues of $76.3M. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than KNOT Offshore Partners LP's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.91x while KNOT Offshore Partners LP's PE ratio is 480.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 2.71x versus 0.73x for KNOT Offshore Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pentair PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of 14.05%. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pentair PLC has an analysts' consensus of $111.14 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that Pentair PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe Pentair PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.376% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.071%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pentair PLC offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pentair PLC pays out 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Pentair PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pentair PLC quarterly revenues of $993.4M. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.91x while Pentair PLC's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 2.71x versus 4.03x for Pentair PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RELX PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat RELX PLC's return on equity of 56.85%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RELX PLC has an analysts' consensus of $50.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.02%. Given that RELX PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe RELX PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.376% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RELX PLC has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.613%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RELX PLC offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RELX PLC pays out 59.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RELX PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RELX PLC quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than RELX PLC's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.91x while RELX PLC's PE ratio is 36.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 2.71x versus 7.46x for RELX PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rentokil Initial PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Rentokil Initial PLC's return on equity of 9.52%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rentokil Initial PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 39.83%. Given that Rentokil Initial PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe Rentokil Initial PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.854, which suggesting that the stock is 85.376% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rentokil Initial PLC has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.074%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rentokil Initial PLC offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rentokil Initial PLC pays out 52.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Rentokil Initial PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rentokil Initial PLC quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Rentokil Initial PLC's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.91x while Rentokil Initial PLC's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 2.71x versus 1.83x for Rentokil Initial PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.