Financhill
Buy
73

RYCEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.42
Seasonality move :
2.14%
Day range:
$18.29 - $18.96
52-week range:
$8.00 - $18.96
Dividend yield:
0.74%
P/E ratio:
17.52x
P/S ratio:
6.20x
P/B ratio:
37.69x
Volume:
195K
Avg. volume:
54.4K
1-year change:
130.69%
Market cap:
$153.5B
Revenue:
$24.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RYCEF
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
-- -- -- -- --
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
-- -- -- -- --
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
-- -- -- -- --
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
-- -- -- -- --
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RYCEF
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
$18.46 -- $153.5B 17.52x $0.06 0.74% 6.20x
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
$24.00 -- $703.5M 71.43x $0.17 1.02% 2.35x
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
$114.94 -- $83.8B 32.02x $0.72 1.59% 2.34x
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
$7.60 -- $2B 33.13x $0.04 1.37% 3.22x
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
$27.37 -- $3.6B 17.18x $0.16 1.79% 1.57x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RYCEF
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
59.19% 0.579 -- 0.74x
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
27.69% 1.790 -- 1.18x
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
41.52% -0.741 -- 0.84x
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
22.34% 1.000 -- 0.64x
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
34.84% 1.331 -- 0.96x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RYCEF
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
-- -- 174.2% -- -- --
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
-- -- 2.92% 4.09% -- --
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
-- -- 10.11% 17.47% -- --
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
-- -- 9.86% 12.3% -- --
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
-- -- -17% -21.53% -- --

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RYCEF or AVNBF?

    Avon Technologies Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Avon Technologies Plc's return on equity of 4.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    -- -- $8.1B
    AVNBF
    Avon Technologies Plc
    -- -- $232.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About RYCEF or AVNBF?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avon Technologies Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Avon Technologies Plc, analysts believe Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is more attractive than Avon Technologies Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    0 0 0
    AVNBF
    Avon Technologies Plc
    0 0 0
  • Is RYCEF or AVNBF More Risky?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.286, which suggesting that the stock is 28.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avon Technologies Plc has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.411%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RYCEF or AVNBF?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Avon Technologies Plc offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Avon Technologies Plc pays out 67.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RYCEF or AVNBF?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Avon Technologies Plc quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Avon Technologies Plc's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.52x while Avon Technologies Plc's PE ratio is 71.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is 6.20x versus 2.35x for Avon Technologies Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    6.20x 17.52x -- --
    AVNBF
    Avon Technologies Plc
    2.35x 71.43x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RYCEF or BAESY?

    BAE Systems Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat BAE Systems Plc's return on equity of 17.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    -- -- $8.1B
    BAESY
    BAE Systems Plc
    -- -- $25.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RYCEF or BAESY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BAE Systems Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than BAE Systems Plc, analysts believe Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is more attractive than BAE Systems Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    0 0 0
    BAESY
    BAE Systems Plc
    0 0 0
  • Is RYCEF or BAESY More Risky?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.286, which suggesting that the stock is 28.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BAE Systems Plc has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.386%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RYCEF or BAESY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. BAE Systems Plc offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. BAE Systems Plc pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RYCEF or BAESY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BAE Systems Plc quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than BAE Systems Plc's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.52x while BAE Systems Plc's PE ratio is 32.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is 6.20x versus 2.34x for BAE Systems Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    6.20x 17.52x -- --
    BAESY
    BAE Systems Plc
    2.34x 32.02x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RYCEF or CMGMY?

    Chemring Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat Chemring Group Plc's return on equity of 12.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    -- -- $8.1B
    CMGMY
    Chemring Group Plc
    -- -- $608.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About RYCEF or CMGMY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chemring Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Chemring Group Plc, analysts believe Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is more attractive than Chemring Group Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    0 0 0
    CMGMY
    Chemring Group Plc
    0 0 0
  • Is RYCEF or CMGMY More Risky?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.286, which suggesting that the stock is 28.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chemring Group Plc has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.405%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RYCEF or CMGMY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Chemring Group Plc offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Chemring Group Plc pays out 43.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RYCEF or CMGMY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chemring Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Chemring Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.52x while Chemring Group Plc's PE ratio is 33.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is 6.20x versus 3.22x for Chemring Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    6.20x 17.52x -- --
    CMGMY
    Chemring Group Plc
    3.22x 33.13x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RYCEF or QNTQY?

    QinetiQ Group plc has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of -- beat QinetiQ Group plc's return on equity of -21.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    -- -- $8.1B
    QNTQY
    QinetiQ Group plc
    -- -- $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About RYCEF or QNTQY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand QinetiQ Group plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than QinetiQ Group plc, analysts believe Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is more attractive than QinetiQ Group plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    0 0 0
    QNTQY
    QinetiQ Group plc
    0 0 0
  • Is RYCEF or QNTQY More Risky?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.286, which suggesting that the stock is 28.581% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QinetiQ Group plc has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.665%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RYCEF or QNTQY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. QinetiQ Group plc offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. QinetiQ Group plc pays out 25.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RYCEF or QNTQY?

    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than QinetiQ Group plc quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than QinetiQ Group plc's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.52x while QinetiQ Group plc's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is 6.20x versus 1.57x for QinetiQ Group plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RYCEF
    Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
    6.20x 17.52x -- --
    QNTQY
    QinetiQ Group plc
    1.57x 17.18x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27

Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.01% over the past day.

Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.02% over the past day.

Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock