How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
32
RPGLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.1250
Seasonality move
:
-14.45%
Day range:
$0.1250 - $0.1250
52-week range:
$0.0007 - $0.4333
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
31.49x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
8K
1-year change:
25%
Market cap:
$36.5M
Revenue:
$656K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
$0.1250 | -- | $36.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 31.49x |
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $42.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
$1.23 | -- | $2.1B | -- | $0.01 | 1.05% | 6.34x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
$1.48 | -- | $667.2M | 10.18x | $0.02 | 1.04% | 10.49x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
$0.0001 | -- | $29.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
$0.29 | -- | $520.8M | 18.13x | $0.00 | 0.45% | 6.48x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-22.01% | 94.981 | -- | 0.21x |
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
54.91% | 0.288 | -- | 0.53x |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
50.36% | 1.846 | -- | 3.87x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | 2.135 | -- | 16.97x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -0.337 | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
1.82% | 0.016 | -- | 6.34x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -708.06% | -803.55% | -- | -- |
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -16.02% | -34.03% | -- | -- |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.81% | -5.51% | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.42% | 3.42% | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.86% | 0.88% | -- | -- |
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RPGLF or ASASF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55% beat Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About RPGLF or ASASF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Asia Standard International Group Ltd., analysts believe Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is more attractive than Asia Standard International Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RPGLF or ASASF More Risky?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, which suggesting that the stock is 2174.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.289%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RPGLF or ASASF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RPGLF or ASASF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is 31.49x versus 0.05x for Asia Standard International Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- -- ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RPGLF or CEVIF?
China Everbright Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55% beat China Everbright Ltd.'s return on equity of -5.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About RPGLF or CEVIF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Everbright Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Everbright Ltd., analysts believe Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is more attractive than China Everbright Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RPGLF or CEVIF More Risky?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, which suggesting that the stock is 2174.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Everbright Ltd. has a beta of -0.043, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RPGLF or CEVIF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Everbright Ltd. offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Ltd. pays out 13.01% of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RPGLF or CEVIF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Everbright Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Everbright Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Everbright Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is 31.49x versus 6.34x for China Everbright Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- -- CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.6.34x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RPGLF or GGPXF?
G-Resources Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55% beat G-Resources Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.-- -- $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About RPGLF or GGPXF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand G-Resources Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than G-Resources Group Ltd., analysts believe Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is more attractive than G-Resources Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RPGLF or GGPXF More Risky?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, which suggesting that the stock is 2174.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-Resources Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.3%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RPGLF or GGPXF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-Resources Group Ltd. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd. pays out 14.59% of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RPGLF or GGPXF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than G-Resources Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than G-Resources Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while G-Resources Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is 31.49x versus 10.49x for G-Resources Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- -- GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.10.49x 10.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RPGLF or TLGN?
Ever Harvest International Group has a net margin of -- compared to Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55% beat Ever Harvest International Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M TLGNEver Harvest International Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RPGLF or TLGN?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ever Harvest International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ever Harvest International Group, analysts believe Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is more attractive than Ever Harvest International Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 TLGNEver Harvest International Group0 0 0 -
Is RPGLF or TLGN More Risky?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, which suggesting that the stock is 2174.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ever Harvest International Group has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RPGLF or TLGN?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ever Harvest International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ever Harvest International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RPGLF or TLGN?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ever Harvest International Group quarterly revenues of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Ever Harvest International Group's net income of --. Notably, Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ever Harvest International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is 31.49x versus 0.05x for Ever Harvest International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- -- TLGNEver Harvest International Group0.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RPGLF or VPGLF?
Value Partners Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55% beat Value Partners Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.-- -- $467M -
What do Analysts Say About RPGLF or VPGLF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Value Partners Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Value Partners Group Ltd., analysts believe Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is more attractive than Value Partners Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RPGLF or VPGLF More Risky?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, which suggesting that the stock is 2174.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Partners Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.028, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.761%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RPGLF or VPGLF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Value Partners Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd. pays out 58.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RPGLF or VPGLF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Value Partners Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Value Partners Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Value Partners Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regent Pacific Group Ltd. is 31.49x versus 6.48x for Value Partners Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- -- VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.6.48x 18.13x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
