ROYL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has a net margin of -93.32% compared to Royale Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -9.38%. Royale Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.81%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2037.4%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.80 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that Royale Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, Inc., analysts believe Royale Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne, Inc..

Royale Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.987%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Royale Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. pays out 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royale Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $589.7K, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Royale Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$550.3K is higher than Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s net income of -$95.4M. Notably, Royale Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royale Energy, Inc. is 1.62x versus 0.84x for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp. Plc has a net margin of -93.32% compared to Royale Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -2.64%. Royale Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Noble Corp. Plc's return on equity of 4.9%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2037.4%. On the other hand Noble Corp. Plc has an analysts' consensus of $34.50 which suggests that it could fall by -21.7%. Given that Royale Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Noble Corp. Plc, analysts believe Royale Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Noble Corp. Plc.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp. Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noble Corp. Plc offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Royale Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp. Plc pays out 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp. Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royale Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $589.7K, which are smaller than Noble Corp. Plc quarterly revenues of $798M. Royale Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$550.3K is higher than Noble Corp. Plc's net income of -$21.1M. Notably, Royale Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noble Corp. Plc's PE ratio is 31.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royale Energy, Inc. is 1.62x versus 2.06x for Noble Corp. Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -93.32% compared to Royale Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -0.8%. Royale Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.78%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2037.4%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.16 which suggests that it could fall by -4.78%. Given that Royale Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., analysts believe Royale Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc..

Royale Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.409%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Royale Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royale Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $589.7K, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Royale Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$550.3K is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Royale Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royale Energy, Inc. is 1.62x versus 0.68x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sable Offshore Corp. has a net margin of -93.32% compared to Royale Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Royale Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sable Offshore Corp.'s return on equity of -111.97%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2037.4%. On the other hand Sable Offshore Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $24.40 which suggests that it could grow by 189.44%. Given that Royale Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sable Offshore Corp., analysts believe Royale Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Sable Offshore Corp..

Royale Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sable Offshore Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Royale Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sable Offshore Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royale Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sable Offshore Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Royale Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $589.7K, which are larger than Sable Offshore Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Royale Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$550.3K is higher than Sable Offshore Corp.'s net income of -$110.4M. Notably, Royale Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sable Offshore Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royale Energy, Inc. is 1.62x versus -- for Sable Offshore Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.