RNWHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KNOT Offshore Partners LP has a net margin of -- compared to Renew Holdings PLC's net margin of -4.95%. Renew Holdings PLC's return on equity of 21.79% beat KNOT Offshore Partners LP's return on equity of -2.39%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KNOT Offshore Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 103.58%. Given that KNOT Offshore Partners LP has higher upside potential than Renew Holdings PLC, analysts believe KNOT Offshore Partners LP is more attractive than Renew Holdings PLC.

Renew Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KNOT Offshore Partners LP has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.5%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. KNOT Offshore Partners LP offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Renew Holdings PLC pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. KNOT Offshore Partners LP pays out -30.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Renew Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renew Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KNOT Offshore Partners LP quarterly revenues of $76.3M. Renew Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than KNOT Offshore Partners LP's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Renew Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KNOT Offshore Partners LP's PE ratio is 480.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renew Holdings PLC is 0.45x versus 0.72x for KNOT Offshore Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pentair PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Renew Holdings PLC's net margin of 14.05%. Renew Holdings PLC's return on equity of 21.79% beat Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pentair PLC has an analysts' consensus of $110.78 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that Pentair PLC has higher upside potential than Renew Holdings PLC, analysts believe Pentair PLC is more attractive than Renew Holdings PLC.

Renew Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.071%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Pentair PLC offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Renew Holdings PLC pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Pentair PLC pays out 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renew Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pentair PLC quarterly revenues of $993.4M. Renew Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M. Notably, Renew Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pentair PLC's PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renew Holdings PLC is 0.45x versus 4.12x for Pentair PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RELX PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Renew Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Renew Holdings PLC's return on equity of 21.79% beat RELX PLC's return on equity of 56.85%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RELX PLC has an analysts' consensus of $50.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that RELX PLC has higher upside potential than Renew Holdings PLC, analysts believe RELX PLC is more attractive than Renew Holdings PLC.

Renew Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RELX PLC has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.613%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. RELX PLC offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Renew Holdings PLC pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. RELX PLC pays out 59.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renew Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RELX PLC quarterly revenues of --. Renew Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than RELX PLC's net income of --. Notably, Renew Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RELX PLC's PE ratio is 36.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renew Holdings PLC is 0.45x versus 7.37x for RELX PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rentokil Initial PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Renew Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Renew Holdings PLC's return on equity of 21.79% beat Rentokil Initial PLC's return on equity of 9.52%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rentokil Initial PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.2%. Given that Rentokil Initial PLC has higher upside potential than Renew Holdings PLC, analysts believe Rentokil Initial PLC is more attractive than Renew Holdings PLC.

Renew Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rentokil Initial PLC has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.074%.

Renew Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Rentokil Initial PLC offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Renew Holdings PLC pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rentokil Initial PLC pays out 52.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renew Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rentokil Initial PLC quarterly revenues of --. Renew Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Rentokil Initial PLC's net income of --. Notably, Renew Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rentokil Initial PLC's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renew Holdings PLC is 0.45x versus 1.87x for Rentokil Initial PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.