Financhill
Sell
44

RBGPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$81.05
Seasonality move :
4.1%
Day range:
$81.05 - $81.05
52-week range:
$58.11 - $82.01
Dividend yield:
3.35%
P/E ratio:
34.53x
P/S ratio:
3.07x
P/B ratio:
6.14x
Volume:
587
Avg. volume:
1.9K
1-year change:
35.44%
Market cap:
$54.5B
Revenue:
$18.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.37

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RBGPF
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
-- -- -- -- --
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
$6.3B -- -- -- $97.21
DEO
Diageo Plc
$4.2B -- -- -- $105.17
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
$883.3M $0.54 6.24% 49.55% $16.87
UL
Unilever Plc
$17.3B -- -- -- $71.45
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RBGPF
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
$81.05 -- $54.5B 34.53x $1.14 3.35% 3.07x
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
$91.73 $97.21 $41.2B 25.29x $1.45 2.54% 1.86x
DEO
Diageo Plc
$86.26 $105.17 $47.9B 20.37x $2.52 4.8% 2.36x
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
$12.49 $16.87 $1.8B 8.64x $0.17 5.44% 0.57x
UL
Unilever Plc
$65.77 $71.45 $143.4B 24.00x $0.56 3.32% 2.24x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RBGPF
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
58.83% 0.588 -- 0.36x
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
58.46% -0.175 -- 0.56x
DEO
Diageo Plc
68.17% -0.571 -- 0.61x
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
45.19% -1.196 128.32% 0.55x
UL
Unilever Plc
-- -0.390 -- 0.53x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RBGPF
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
-- -- 8.07% 18.01% -- --
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
-- -- 7.77% 17.57% -- --
DEO
Diageo Plc
-- -- 6.75% 18.76% -- --
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
$242.4M $129.1M 4.18% 7.59% 14.69% $9.1M
UL
Unilever Plc
-- -- 18.14% 25.84% -- --

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RBGPF or CCEP?

    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's return on equity of 17.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    -- -- $21.1B
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
    -- -- $23.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGPF or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has an analysts' consensus of $97.21 which suggests that it could grow by 5.97%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    0 0 0
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
    7 3 0
  • Is RBGPF or CCEP More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.928%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGPF or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc pays out 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGPF or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's PE ratio is 25.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.07x versus 1.86x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    3.07x 34.53x -- --
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
    1.86x 25.29x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGPF or DEO?

    Diageo Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Diageo Plc's return on equity of 18.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    -- -- $21.1B
    DEO
    Diageo Plc
    -- -- $36.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGPF or DEO?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diageo Plc has an analysts' consensus of $105.17 which suggests that it could grow by 21.92%. Given that Diageo Plc has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Diageo Plc is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    0 0 0
    DEO
    Diageo Plc
    3 3 1
  • Is RBGPF or DEO More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo Plc has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.988%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGPF or DEO?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Diageo Plc offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo Plc pays out 95.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGPF or DEO?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo Plc quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Diageo Plc's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Diageo Plc's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.07x versus 2.36x for Diageo Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    3.07x 34.53x -- --
    DEO
    Diageo Plc
    2.36x 20.37x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGPF or NOMD?

    Nomad Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of 7.66%. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Nomad Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    -- -- $21.1B
    NOMD
    Nomad Foods Ltd.
    27.57% $0.46 $5.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGPF or NOMD?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomad Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.87 which suggests that it could grow by 35.04%. Given that Nomad Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Nomad Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    0 0 0
    NOMD
    Nomad Foods Ltd.
    4 0 0
  • Is RBGPF or NOMD More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.311%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGPF or NOMD?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Nomad Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods Ltd. pays out 39.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGPF or NOMD?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of $879.2M. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods Ltd.'s net income of $67.3M. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Nomad Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.07x versus 0.57x for Nomad Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    3.07x 34.53x -- --
    NOMD
    Nomad Foods Ltd.
    0.57x 8.64x $879.2M $67.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGPF or UL?

    Unilever Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Unilever Plc's return on equity of 25.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    -- -- $21.1B
    UL
    Unilever Plc
    -- -- $23.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGPF or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever Plc has an analysts' consensus of $71.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Unilever Plc has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Unilever Plc is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    0 0 0
    UL
    Unilever Plc
    3 0 0
  • Is RBGPF or UL More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever Plc has a beta of 0.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.334%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGPF or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Unilever Plc offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever Plc pays out 74.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGPF or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever Plc quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Unilever Plc's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Unilever Plc's PE ratio is 24.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.07x versus 2.24x for Unilever Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGPF
    Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc
    3.07x 34.53x -- --
    UL
    Unilever Plc
    2.24x 24.00x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.

Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.

Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock