PZRIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of 76.91% compared to Pizza Pizza Royalty's net margin of 0.4%. Pizza Pizza Royalty's return on equity of 10.54% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.46%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pizza Pizza Royalty has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe Pizza Pizza Royalty is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.806%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.43%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Pizza Pizza Royalty pays 99.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pizza Pizza Royalty quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are smaller than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $46M. Pizza Pizza Royalty's net income of $5.6M is higher than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $184K. Notably, Pizza Pizza Royalty's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pizza Pizza Royalty is 9.97x versus 0.24x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BJ's Restaurants has a net margin of 76.91% compared to Pizza Pizza Royalty's net margin of -0.9%. Pizza Pizza Royalty's return on equity of 10.54% beat BJ's Restaurants's return on equity of 8.05%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BJ's Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $38.88 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that BJ's Restaurants has higher upside potential than Pizza Pizza Royalty, analysts believe BJ's Restaurants is more attractive than Pizza Pizza Royalty.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BJ's Restaurants has a beta of 2.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.01%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.43%. BJ's Restaurants offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pizza Pizza Royalty pays 99.37% of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants pays out 0.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pizza Pizza Royalty quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are smaller than BJ's Restaurants quarterly revenues of $325.7M. Pizza Pizza Royalty's net income of $5.6M is higher than BJ's Restaurants's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Pizza Pizza Royalty's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while BJ's Restaurants's PE ratio is 29.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pizza Pizza Royalty is 9.97x versus 0.65x for BJ's Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Priszm Income Fund has a net margin of 76.91% compared to Pizza Pizza Royalty's net margin of --. Pizza Pizza Royalty's return on equity of 10.54% beat Priszm Income Fund's return on equity of --.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Priszm Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pizza Pizza Royalty has higher upside potential than Priszm Income Fund, analysts believe Pizza Pizza Royalty is more attractive than Priszm Income Fund.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Priszm Income Fund has a beta of -12.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1375.001%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.43%. Priszm Income Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pizza Pizza Royalty pays 99.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Priszm Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pizza Pizza Royalty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pizza Pizza Royalty quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are larger than Priszm Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Pizza Pizza Royalty's net income of $5.6M is higher than Priszm Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Pizza Pizza Royalty's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Priszm Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pizza Pizza Royalty is 9.97x versus -- for Priszm Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of 76.91% compared to Pizza Pizza Royalty's net margin of --. Pizza Pizza Royalty's return on equity of 10.54% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pizza Pizza Royalty has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe Pizza Pizza Royalty is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.43%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pizza Pizza Royalty pays 99.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pizza Pizza Royalty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pizza Pizza Royalty quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. Pizza Pizza Royalty's net income of $5.6M is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, Pizza Pizza Royalty's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.74x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pizza Pizza Royalty is 9.97x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.