PWRHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fitell has a net margin of -- compared to PWR Holdings's net margin of --. PWR Holdings's return on equity of 26.24% beat Fitell's return on equity of -110.03%.

PWR Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fitell has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PWR Holdings has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe PWR Holdings is more attractive than Fitell.

PWR Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fitell has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PWR Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Fitell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PWR Holdings pays 55.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Fitell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PWR Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PWR Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fitell quarterly revenues of --. PWR Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Fitell's net income of --. Notably, PWR Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.98x while Fitell's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PWR Holdings is 6.58x versus 28.09x for Fitell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amotiv has a net margin of -- compared to PWR Holdings's net margin of --. PWR Holdings's return on equity of 26.24% beat Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6%.

PWR Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amotiv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PWR Holdings has higher upside potential than Amotiv, analysts believe PWR Holdings is more attractive than Amotiv.

PWR Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amotiv has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.558%.

PWR Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Amotiv offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. PWR Holdings pays 55.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PWR Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amotiv quarterly revenues of --. PWR Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Amotiv's net income of --. Notably, PWR Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.98x while Amotiv's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PWR Holdings is 6.58x versus 1.25x for Amotiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to PWR Holdings's net margin of --. PWR Holdings's return on equity of 26.24% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

PWR Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 407.08%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than PWR Holdings, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than PWR Holdings.

PWR Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PWR Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PWR Holdings pays 55.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PWR Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PWR Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. PWR Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, PWR Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.98x while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PWR Holdings is 6.58x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesfarmers has a net margin of -- compared to PWR Holdings's net margin of --. PWR Holdings's return on equity of 26.24% beat Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62%.

PWR Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wesfarmers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PWR Holdings has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe PWR Holdings is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

PWR Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.225%.

PWR Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Wesfarmers offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. PWR Holdings pays 55.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PWR Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wesfarmers quarterly revenues of --. PWR Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Wesfarmers's net income of --. Notably, PWR Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.98x while Wesfarmers's PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PWR Holdings is 6.58x versus 1.76x for Wesfarmers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.