PRRCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commerzbank AG has a net margin of 6.01% compared to ProCredit Holding AG's net margin of 25.99%. ProCredit Holding AG's return on equity of 7.28% beat Commerzbank AG's return on equity of 8.76%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Commerzbank AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProCredit Holding AG has higher upside potential than Commerzbank AG, analysts believe ProCredit Holding AG is more attractive than Commerzbank AG.

ProCredit Holding AG has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commerzbank AG has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.088%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Commerzbank AG offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. ProCredit Holding AG pays 33.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Commerzbank AG pays out 23.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProCredit Holding AG quarterly revenues are $217.4M, which are smaller than Commerzbank AG quarterly revenues of $3.6B. ProCredit Holding AG's net income of $13.1M is lower than Commerzbank AG's net income of $931.1M. Notably, ProCredit Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Commerzbank AG's PE ratio is 23.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProCredit Holding AG is 0.88x versus 2.03x for Commerzbank AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deutsche Bank AG has a net margin of 6.01% compared to ProCredit Holding AG's net margin of 10.87%. ProCredit Holding AG's return on equity of 7.28% beat Deutsche Bank AG's return on equity of 9.86%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deutsche Bank AG has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.55%. Given that Deutsche Bank AG has higher upside potential than ProCredit Holding AG, analysts believe Deutsche Bank AG is more attractive than ProCredit Holding AG.

ProCredit Holding AG has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deutsche Bank AG has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.357%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Deutsche Bank AG offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. ProCredit Holding AG pays 33.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Deutsche Bank AG pays out 28.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProCredit Holding AG quarterly revenues are $217.4M, which are smaller than Deutsche Bank AG quarterly revenues of $16.9B. ProCredit Holding AG's net income of $13.1M is lower than Deutsche Bank AG's net income of $1.8B. Notably, ProCredit Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Deutsche Bank AG's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProCredit Holding AG is 0.88x versus 1.07x for Deutsche Bank AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MLP SE has a net margin of 6.01% compared to ProCredit Holding AG's net margin of 6.62%. ProCredit Holding AG's return on equity of 7.28% beat MLP SE's return on equity of 11.23%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MLP SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProCredit Holding AG has higher upside potential than MLP SE, analysts believe ProCredit Holding AG is more attractive than MLP SE.

ProCredit Holding AG has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MLP SE has a beta of -0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.984%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. MLP SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. ProCredit Holding AG pays 33.31% of its earnings as a dividend. MLP SE pays out 56.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProCredit Holding AG quarterly revenues are $217.4M, which are smaller than MLP SE quarterly revenues of $277.1M. ProCredit Holding AG's net income of $13.1M is lower than MLP SE's net income of $18.3M. Notably, ProCredit Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while MLP SE's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProCredit Holding AG is 0.88x versus 0.54x for MLP SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG has a net margin of 6.01% compared to ProCredit Holding AG's net margin of 20.34%. ProCredit Holding AG's return on equity of 7.28% beat Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG's return on equity of 2.49%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProCredit Holding AG has higher upside potential than Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG, analysts believe ProCredit Holding AG is more attractive than Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG.

ProCredit Holding AG has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.323% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG has a beta of 0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.761%.

ProCredit Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProCredit Holding AG pays 33.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG pays out 31.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProCredit Holding AG quarterly revenues are $217.4M, which are larger than Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG quarterly revenues of $124.2M. ProCredit Holding AG's net income of $13.1M is lower than Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG's net income of $25.3M. Notably, ProCredit Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG's PE ratio is 10.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProCredit Holding AG is 0.88x versus 0.28x for Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.