PNDRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Pandora AS's net margin of -155.73%. Pandora AS's return on equity of 125.91% beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.19%.

Pandora AS has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 23.69%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.23 which suggests that it could grow by 42.84%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pandora AS, analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Pandora AS.

Pandora AS has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.813%.

Pandora AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pandora AS pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pandora AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pandora AS quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $522.7M. Pandora AS's net income of $444M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$814M. Notably, Pandora AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.10x while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pandora AS is 1.14x versus 7.62x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Pandora AS's net margin of 2%. Pandora AS's return on equity of 125.91% beat LCI Industries's return on equity of 13.72%.

Pandora AS has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 23.69%. On the other hand LCI Industries has an analysts' consensus of $160.40 which suggests that it could grow by 30.73%. Given that LCI Industries has higher upside potential than Pandora AS, analysts believe LCI Industries is more attractive than Pandora AS.

Pandora AS has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LCI Industries has a beta of 1.357, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.699%.

Pandora AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. LCI Industries offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Pandora AS pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. LCI Industries pays out 60.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pandora AS quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than LCI Industries quarterly revenues of $932.7M. Pandora AS's net income of $444M is higher than LCI Industries's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Pandora AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.10x while LCI Industries's PE ratio is 16.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pandora AS is 1.14x versus 0.74x for LCI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patrick Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Pandora AS's net margin of 3.15%. Pandora AS's return on equity of 125.91% beat Patrick Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.71%.

Pandora AS has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 23.69%. On the other hand Patrick Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $137.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that Pandora AS has higher upside potential than Patrick Industries, Inc., analysts believe Pandora AS is more attractive than Patrick Industries, Inc..

Pandora AS has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patrick Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.007%.

Pandora AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. Patrick Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Pandora AS pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Patrick Industries, Inc. pays out 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pandora AS quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Patrick Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $924.2M. Pandora AS's net income of $444M is higher than Patrick Industries, Inc.'s net income of $29.1M. Notably, Pandora AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.10x while Patrick Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pandora AS is 1.14x versus 1.02x for Patrick Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PHINIA, Inc. has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Pandora AS's net margin of 5.06%. Pandora AS's return on equity of 125.91% beat PHINIA, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.22%.

Pandora AS has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 23.69%. On the other hand PHINIA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.42%. Given that PHINIA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pandora AS, analysts believe PHINIA, Inc. is more attractive than Pandora AS.

Pandora AS has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PHINIA, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pandora AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.58%. PHINIA, Inc. offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Pandora AS pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. PHINIA, Inc. pays out 33.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pandora AS quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than PHINIA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $889M. Pandora AS's net income of $444M is higher than PHINIA, Inc.'s net income of $45M. Notably, Pandora AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.10x while PHINIA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pandora AS is 1.14x versus 0.78x for PHINIA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.