PHCCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healios KK has a net margin of -3.73% compared to PHC Holdings's net margin of -107.23%. PHC Holdings's return on equity of -9.21% beat Healios KK's return on equity of -137.21%.

PHC Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Healios KK has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PHC Holdings has higher upside potential than Healios KK, analysts believe PHC Holdings is more attractive than Healios KK.

PHC Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healios KK has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PHC Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Healios KK offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHC Holdings pays -70.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Healios KK pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHC Holdings quarterly revenues are $546.5M, which are larger than Healios KK quarterly revenues of $3.2M. PHC Holdings's net income of -$20.4M is lower than Healios KK's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, PHC Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healios KK's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHC Holdings is 0.33x versus 22.75x for Healios KK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PeptiDream has a net margin of -3.73% compared to PHC Holdings's net margin of -5.57%. PHC Holdings's return on equity of -9.21% beat PeptiDream's return on equity of 34.66%.

PHC Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PeptiDream has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PHC Holdings has higher upside potential than PeptiDream, analysts believe PHC Holdings is more attractive than PeptiDream.

PHC Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PeptiDream has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.554%.

PHC Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. PeptiDream offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHC Holdings pays -70.12% of its earnings as a dividend. PeptiDream pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHC Holdings quarterly revenues are $546.5M, which are larger than PeptiDream quarterly revenues of $36.8M. PHC Holdings's net income of -$20.4M is lower than PeptiDream's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, PHC Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PeptiDream's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHC Holdings is 0.33x versus 7.43x for PeptiDream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nxera Pharma has a net margin of -3.73% compared to PHC Holdings's net margin of 12.96%. PHC Holdings's return on equity of -9.21% beat Nxera Pharma's return on equity of -5.58%.

PHC Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nxera Pharma has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PHC Holdings has higher upside potential than Nxera Pharma, analysts believe PHC Holdings is more attractive than Nxera Pharma.

PHC Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nxera Pharma has a beta of 0.401, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.86%.

PHC Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Nxera Pharma offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PHC Holdings pays -70.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Nxera Pharma pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PHC Holdings quarterly revenues are $546.5M, which are larger than Nxera Pharma quarterly revenues of $62.4M. PHC Holdings's net income of -$20.4M is lower than Nxera Pharma's net income of $8.1M. Notably, PHC Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nxera Pharma's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHC Holdings is 0.33x versus 2.95x for Nxera Pharma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Takeda Pharmaceutical has a net margin of -3.73% compared to PHC Holdings's net margin of 7.83%. PHC Holdings's return on equity of -9.21% beat Takeda Pharmaceutical's return on equity of 4.01%.

PHC Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Takeda Pharmaceutical has an analysts' consensus of $15.73 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that Takeda Pharmaceutical has higher upside potential than PHC Holdings, analysts believe Takeda Pharmaceutical is more attractive than PHC Holdings.

PHC Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Takeda Pharmaceutical has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.642%.

PHC Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Takeda Pharmaceutical offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. PHC Holdings pays -70.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Takeda Pharmaceutical pays out 199.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

PHC Holdings quarterly revenues are $546.5M, which are smaller than Takeda Pharmaceutical quarterly revenues of $7.9B. PHC Holdings's net income of -$20.4M is lower than Takeda Pharmaceutical's net income of $619.7M. Notably, PHC Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Takeda Pharmaceutical's PE ratio is 22.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PHC Holdings is 0.33x versus 1.40x for Takeda Pharmaceutical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.