OEZVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 14.64% compared to VERBUND AG's net margin of --. VERBUND AG's return on equity of 15.22% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.

VERBUND AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VERBUND AG has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe VERBUND AG is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..

VERBUND AG has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.872%.

VERBUND AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. VERBUND AG pays 73.48% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VERBUND AG quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. VERBUND AG's net income of $364.2M is higher than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, VERBUND AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VERBUND AG is 2.76x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 14.64% compared to VERBUND AG's net margin of --. VERBUND AG's return on equity of 15.22% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.

VERBUND AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VERBUND AG has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe VERBUND AG is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..

VERBUND AG has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.475%.

VERBUND AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. VERBUND AG pays 73.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VERBUND AG quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. VERBUND AG's net income of $364.2M is higher than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, VERBUND AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VERBUND AG is 2.76x versus 172.69x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 14.64% compared to VERBUND AG's net margin of 0.85%. VERBUND AG's return on equity of 15.22% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.

VERBUND AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than VERBUND AG, analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than VERBUND AG.

VERBUND AG has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.

VERBUND AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. VERBUND AG pays 73.48% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VERBUND AG quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. VERBUND AG's net income of $364.2M is higher than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, VERBUND AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VERBUND AG is 2.76x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.