NIHK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Netcapital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Video River Networks, Inc.'s net margin of -4167.32%. Video River Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.7% beat Netcapital, Inc.'s return on equity of -111.21%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Netcapital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34900.04%. Given that Netcapital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Video River Networks, Inc., analysts believe Netcapital, Inc. is more attractive than Video River Networks, Inc..

Video River Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 77.911% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netcapital, Inc. has a beta of 0.817, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.348%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netcapital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Video River Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netcapital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Video River Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Netcapital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $51.1K. Video River Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3K is higher than Netcapital, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Video River Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.39x while Netcapital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Video River Networks, Inc. is 0.85x versus 3.69x for Netcapital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Mountain Finance Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Video River Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 15.32%. Video River Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.7% beat New Mountain Finance Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Mountain Finance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that New Mountain Finance Corp. has higher upside potential than Video River Networks, Inc., analysts believe New Mountain Finance Corp. is more attractive than Video River Networks, Inc..

Video River Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 77.911% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Mountain Finance Corp. has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.754%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Mountain Finance Corp. offers a yield of 14.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Video River Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Mountain Finance Corp. pays out 124.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Video River Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New Mountain Finance Corp. quarterly revenues of $80.5M. Video River Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3K is lower than New Mountain Finance Corp.'s net income of $12.3M. Notably, Video River Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.39x while New Mountain Finance Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Video River Networks, Inc. is 0.85x versus 2.71x for New Mountain Finance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxford Square Capital Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Video River Networks, Inc.'s net margin of -20.5%. Video River Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.7% beat Oxford Square Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -1.63%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oxford Square Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that Oxford Square Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Video River Networks, Inc., analysts believe Oxford Square Capital Corp. is more attractive than Video River Networks, Inc..

Video River Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 77.911% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxford Square Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.153%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxford Square Capital Corp. offers a yield of 23.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Video River Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Square Capital Corp. pays out 453.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Video River Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oxford Square Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Video River Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3K is higher than Oxford Square Capital Corp.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Video River Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.39x while Oxford Square Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 236.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Video River Networks, Inc. is 0.85x versus 56.30x for Oxford Square Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prospect Capital Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Video River Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 50.07%. Video River Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.7% beat Prospect Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -5.3%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prospect Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.4%. Given that Prospect Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Video River Networks, Inc., analysts believe Prospect Capital Corp. is more attractive than Video River Networks, Inc..

Video River Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.221, which suggesting that the stock is 77.911% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prospect Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.447%.

Video River Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prospect Capital Corp. offers a yield of 21.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Video River Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prospect Capital Corp. pays out 70.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Prospect Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Video River Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prospect Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $155.7M. Video River Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3K is lower than Prospect Capital Corp.'s net income of $78M. Notably, Video River Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.39x while Prospect Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Video River Networks, Inc. is 0.85x versus 5.29x for Prospect Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.