Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
$33.98 | -- | $31.4B | 14.96x | $0.33 | 0% | 1.67x |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
$20.55 | -- | $683M | 16.55x | $0.33 | 2.92% | 3.22x |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
$33.05 | -- | $20.4B | 10.03x | $0.55 | 0% | 0.57x |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
$1.31 | -- | $17.9M | 3.10x | $0.02 | 0% | 0.14x |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
$21.44 | -- | $4.5B | 11.26x | $0.33 | 3.28% | 1.66x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
58.63% | -0.115 | 100.85% | 0.10x |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
37.48% | 1.152 | 80.38% | 4.02x |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
50.21% | -0.379 | 79.74% | 0.41x |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
72.89% | 3.324 | 235.61% | 0.20x |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
71.08% | 0.422 | 225.01% | 0.50x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
$840.1M | $397.8M | 3.78% | 9.23% | 10.65% | -- |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
$20.3M | $9.6M | 2.99% | 4.57% | 26.94% | -- |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $700.4M | 5.93% | 11.47% | 7.72% | -- |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.98% | 16.92% | -- | -- |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
$188.7M | $112.3M | 3.24% | 10.81% | 18.4% | -- |
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.52% compared to Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 18.75%. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.23% beat GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.57%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
22.48% | $0.20 | $53.6B |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
57.03% | $0.20 | $1.5B |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than GOLDCREST Co., Ltd., analysts believe Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is more attractive than GOLDCREST Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.251, which suggesting that the stock is 74.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.101%.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. pays 24.39% of its earnings as a dividend. GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. pays out 66.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than GOLDCREST Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $131.6M is higher than GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.'s net income of $6.7M. Notably, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.96x while GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is 1.67x versus 3.22x for GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
1.67x | 14.96x | $3.7B | $131.6M |
|
CDCTF
GOLDCREST Co., Ltd.
|
3.22x | 16.55x | $35.5M | $6.7M |
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.52% compared to Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 4.67%. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.23% beat Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.47%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
22.48% | $0.20 | $53.6B |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
19.81% | $0.67 | $36.7B |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd., analysts believe Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.251, which suggesting that the stock is 74.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.275%.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. pays 24.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.1B. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $131.6M is lower than Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.'s net income of $423.5M. Notably, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.96x while Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is 1.67x versus 0.57x for Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
1.67x | 14.96x | $3.7B | $131.6M |
|
DWAHY
Daiwa House Industry Co., Ltd.
|
0.57x | 10.03x | $9.1B | $423.5M |
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.52% compared to Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.23% beat Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.92%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
22.48% | $0.20 | $53.6B |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $97.3M |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd., analysts believe Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.251, which suggesting that the stock is 74.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. pays 24.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. pays out 27.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $131.6M is higher than Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.96x while Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is 1.67x versus 0.14x for Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
1.67x | 14.96x | $3.7B | $131.6M |
|
LRE
Lead Real Estate Co., Ltd.
|
0.14x | 3.10x | -- | -- |
Mirarth Holdings has a net margin of 3.52% compared to Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.23% beat Mirarth Holdings's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
22.48% | $0.20 | $53.6B |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mirarth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mirarth Holdings, analysts believe Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Mirarth Holdings.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.251, which suggesting that the stock is 74.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mirarth Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mirarth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. pays 24.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mirarth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Mirarth Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $131.6M is higher than Mirarth Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.96x while Mirarth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is 1.67x versus -- for Mirarth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
1.67x | 14.96x | $3.7B | $131.6M |
|
TKLLF
Mirarth Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.52% compared to Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 10.17%. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.23% beat Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.81%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
22.48% | $0.20 | $53.6B |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
30.91% | $0.29 | $13B |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd., analysts believe Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.251, which suggesting that the stock is 74.909% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.212%.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. pays 24.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $610.6M. Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s net income of $131.6M is higher than Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.96x while Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. is 1.67x versus 1.66x for Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd.
|
1.67x | 14.96x | $3.7B | $131.6M |
|
TYTMF
Tokyo Tatemono Co., Ltd.
|
1.66x | 11.26x | $610.6M | $62.1M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.