MHVYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a net margin of 5.6% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 3.46%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.84% beat Kawasaki Heavy Industries's return on equity of 4.04%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kawasaki Heavy Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than Kawasaki Heavy Industries, analysts believe Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is more attractive than Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kawasaki Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.511%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Kawasaki Heavy Industries offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kawasaki Heavy Industries pays out 52.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Kawasaki Heavy Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $399.6M is higher than Kawasaki Heavy Industries's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Kawasaki Heavy Industries's PE ratio is 36.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.49x versus 0.62x for Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi Electric has a net margin of 5.6% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 3.82%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.84% beat Mitsubishi Electric's return on equity of 7.57%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Electric, analysts believe Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is more attractive than Mitsubishi Electric.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Electric has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.183%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Mitsubishi Electric offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Electric pays out 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi Electric quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $399.6M is higher than Mitsubishi Electric's net income of $315.2M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Mitsubishi Electric's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.49x versus 1.00x for Mitsubishi Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 5.6% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 5.34%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.84% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.73%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.57% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 22.65% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $399.6M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 1.49x versus 2.59x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.