MCHVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MGM Resorts International has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings's net margin of 4.41%. MGM China Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92%.

MGM China Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $49.54 which suggests that it could grow by 49.09%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than MGM China Holdings.

MGM China Holdings has a beta of 0.220, which suggesting that the stock is 78.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.04%.

MGM China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM China Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.2B. MGM China Holdings's net income of -- is lower than MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M. Notably, MGM China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.28x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.62x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. MGM China Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

MGM China Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.15 which suggests that it could grow by 63.1%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than MGM China Holdings.

MGM China Holdings has a beta of 0.220, which suggesting that the stock is 78.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.707%.

MGM China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM China Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. MGM China Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, MGM China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.28x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.54x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sands China has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings's net margin of --. MGM China Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sands China's return on equity of --.

MGM China Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sands China has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MGM China Holdings has higher upside potential than Sands China, analysts believe MGM China Holdings is more attractive than Sands China.

MGM China Holdings has a beta of 0.220, which suggesting that the stock is 78.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sands China has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.401%.

MGM China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Sands China offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MGM China Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sands China quarterly revenues of --. MGM China Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Sands China's net income of --. Notably, MGM China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.28x while Sands China's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.88x for Sands China. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Macau has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings's net margin of --. MGM China Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Wynn Macau's return on equity of --.

MGM China Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wynn Macau has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MGM China Holdings has higher upside potential than Wynn Macau, analysts believe MGM China Holdings is more attractive than Wynn Macau.

MGM China Holdings has a beta of 0.220, which suggesting that the stock is 78.024% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Macau has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.248%.

MGM China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Wynn Macau offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. MGM China Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Macau pays out 0.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Macau's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGM China Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wynn Macau quarterly revenues of --. MGM China Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Wynn Macau's net income of --. Notably, MGM China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.28x while Wynn Macau's PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.16x for Wynn Macau. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.