LITRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a net margin of -220.86% compared to Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.99% beat Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Golden Royal Development, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Golden Royal Development, Inc., analysts believe Lithium Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Golden Royal Development, Inc..

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Royal Development, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Royal Development, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Royal Development, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $417K, which are larger than Golden Royal Development, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$921K is lower than Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s net income of -$6.1K. Notably, Lithium Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Royal Development, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Royalty Corp. is 148.03x versus -- for Golden Royal Development, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a net margin of -220.86% compared to Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.99% beat Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s return on equity of --.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metaline Contact Mines Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Metaline Contact Mines Co., analysts believe Lithium Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Metaline Contact Mines Co..

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metaline Contact Mines Co. has a beta of 2.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.148%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metaline Contact Mines Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metaline Contact Mines Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $417K, which are larger than Metaline Contact Mines Co. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$921K is higher than Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s net income of --. Notably, Lithium Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metaline Contact Mines Co.'s PE ratio is 880.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Royalty Corp. is 148.03x versus 79.36x for Metaline Contact Mines Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -220.86% compared to Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.99% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 40.5%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Lithium Royalty Corp..

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $417K, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$921K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Lithium Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Royalty Corp. is 148.03x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -220.86% compared to Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.99% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 137.76%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Lithium Royalty Corp..

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $417K, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$921K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Lithium Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Royalty Corp. is 148.03x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.