Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Sell
7
LBRMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0000
Seasonality move
:
131.97%
Day range:
$0.0001 - $0.0001
52-week range:
$0.0001 - $0.1200
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.06x
P/B ratio:
0.00x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
13.9K
1-year change:
-99.92%
Market cap:
$16.2K
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBRMF
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GBRIF
Golden Band Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBKRF
Highbank Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGGDF
Sage Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBRMF
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0001 | -- | $16.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
$0.0015 | -- | $10.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GBRIF
Golden Band Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0001 | -- | $28.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.23x |
|
HBKRF
Highbank Resources Ltd.
|
$0.0012 | -- | $28.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SGGDF
Sage Gold, Inc.
|
$0.0001 | -- | $11K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBRMF
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.
|
0.33% | -0.268 | 0.27% | 0.02x |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -3.038 | -- | 13.93x |
|
GBRIF
Golden Band Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 90.119 | -- | -- |
|
HBKRF
Highbank Resources Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SGGDF
Sage Gold, Inc.
|
-- | 64.809 | -- | -- |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -5.794 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LBRMF
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -$125.6K | -2.08% | -2.08% | -- | -$105.6K |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$125.6K | -61.34% | -61.34% | -- | -$174.4K |
|
GBRIF
Golden Band Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBKRF
Highbank Resources Ltd.
|
-$10 | -$22.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$17.4K |
|
SGGDF
Sage Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WGMCF
Winston Gold
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LBRMF or ALGLF?
Alma Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.08% beat Alma Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -61.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.-- -$0.00 $17.4M ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $2M -
What do Analysts Say About LBRMF or ALGLF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alma Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Alma Gold, Inc., analysts believe Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Alma Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LBRMF or ALGLF More Risky?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alma Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBRMF or ALGLF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alma Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alma Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBRMF or ALGLF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alma Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Alma Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$128.8K. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alma Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Alma Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0.06x -- -- -$125.5K ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$128.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns LBRMF or GBRIF?
Golden Band Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.08% beat Golden Band Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.-- -$0.00 $17.4M GBRIFGolden Band Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBRMF or GBRIF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Golden Band Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Golden Band Resources, Inc., analysts believe Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Golden Band Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GBRIFGolden Band Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LBRMF or GBRIF More Risky?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Band Resources, Inc. has a beta of 54.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5334.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBRMF or GBRIF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Band Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Band Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBRMF or GBRIF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Golden Band Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Golden Band Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Band Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus 0.23x for Golden Band Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0.06x -- -- -$125.5K GBRIFGolden Band Resources, Inc.0.23x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LBRMF or HBKRF?
Highbank Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.08% beat Highbank Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.-- -$0.00 $17.4M HBKRFHighbank Resources Ltd.-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBRMF or HBKRF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highbank Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highbank Resources Ltd., analysts believe Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Highbank Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HBKRFHighbank Resources Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LBRMF or HBKRF More Risky?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highbank Resources Ltd. has a beta of -4.175, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 517.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBRMF or HBKRF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highbank Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highbank Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBRMF or HBKRF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Highbank Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is lower than Highbank Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$116.9K. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highbank Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Highbank Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0.06x -- -- -$125.5K HBKRFHighbank Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$116.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns LBRMF or SGGDF?
Sage Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.08% beat Sage Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.-- -$0.00 $17.4M SGGDFSage Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBRMF or SGGDF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sage Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sage Gold, Inc., analysts believe Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sage Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SGGDFSage Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LBRMF or SGGDF More Risky?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sage Gold, Inc. has a beta of 9.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 856.551%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBRMF or SGGDF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sage Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sage Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBRMF or SGGDF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Sage Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Sage Gold, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sage Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Sage Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0.06x -- -- -$125.5K SGGDFSage Gold, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LBRMF or WGMCF?
Winston Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.08% beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.-- -$0.00 $17.4M WGMCFWinston Gold-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LBRMF or WGMCF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Winston Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 WGMCFWinston Gold0 0 0 -
Is LBRMF or WGMCF More Risky?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.542%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LBRMF or WGMCF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LBRMF or WGMCF?
Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LBRMFLabrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.0.06x -- -- -$125.5K WGMCFWinston Gold-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
