LBRMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Endeavour Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -30.56%. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.13% beat Endeavour Silver Corp.'s return on equity of -19.75%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Endeavour Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.9167 which suggests that it could grow by 14.38%. Given that Endeavour Silver Corp. has higher upside potential than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Endeavour Silver Corp. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd..

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.954%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endeavour Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Endeavour Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $137.3M. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Endeavour Silver Corp.'s net income of -$42M. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Endeavour Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus 7.16x for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.13% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.61%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd..

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus 50.10x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.13% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 57.09%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd..

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC the metals co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.13% beat TMC the metals co., Inc.'s return on equity of -3890.83%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TMC the metals co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that TMC the metals co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd., analysts believe TMC the metals co., Inc. is more attractive than Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd..

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 2.400, which suggesting that the stock is 139.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC the metals co., Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC the metals co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC the metals co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TMC the metals co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$125.5K is higher than TMC the metals co., Inc.'s net income of -$184.5M. Notably, Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TMC the metals co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for TMC the metals co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.