KXSCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Kinaxis's net margin of -12.65%. Kinaxis's return on equity of 4.63% beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of 3.33%.

Kinaxis has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinaxis has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe Kinaxis is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

Kinaxis has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.626%.

Kinaxis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinaxis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinaxis quarterly revenues are $121.5M, which are larger than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Kinaxis's net income of $6.8M is higher than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$142.2K. Notably, Kinaxis's price-to-earnings ratio is 171.66x while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinaxis is 7.38x versus 1.61x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ehave has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Kinaxis's net margin of --. Kinaxis's return on equity of 4.63% beat Ehave's return on equity of --.

Kinaxis has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ehave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinaxis has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Kinaxis is more attractive than Ehave.

Kinaxis has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ehave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinaxis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ehave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinaxis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ehave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinaxis quarterly revenues are $121.5M, which are larger than Ehave quarterly revenues of --. Kinaxis's net income of $6.8M is higher than Ehave's net income of --. Notably, Kinaxis's price-to-earnings ratio is 171.66x while Ehave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinaxis is 7.38x versus -- for Ehave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Kinaxis's net margin of -938.01%. Kinaxis's return on equity of 4.63% beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Kinaxis has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 69.63%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Kinaxis, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Kinaxis.

Kinaxis has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinaxis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinaxis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinaxis quarterly revenues are $121.5M, which are larger than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Kinaxis's net income of $6.8M is higher than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Kinaxis's price-to-earnings ratio is 171.66x while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinaxis is 7.38x versus 53.83x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Versus Systems has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Kinaxis's net margin of -13746.13%. Kinaxis's return on equity of 4.63% beat Versus Systems's return on equity of -275.9%.

Kinaxis has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Versus Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -18.79%. Given that Versus Systems has higher upside potential than Kinaxis, analysts believe Versus Systems is more attractive than Kinaxis.

Kinaxis has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Versus Systems has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.804%.

Kinaxis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Versus Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinaxis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Versus Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kinaxis quarterly revenues are $121.5M, which are larger than Versus Systems quarterly revenues of $3.9K. Kinaxis's net income of $6.8M is higher than Versus Systems's net income of -$529K. Notably, Kinaxis's price-to-earnings ratio is 171.66x while Versus Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinaxis is 7.38x versus 67.37x for Versus Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.