How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
43
IMBBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.13
Seasonality move
:
-0.35%
Day range:
$41.77 - $42.17
52-week range:
$33.52 - $44.23
Dividend yield:
5.52%
P/E ratio:
12.85x
P/S ratio:
1.41x
P/B ratio:
5.27x
Volume:
207.8K
Avg. volume:
122.1K
1-year change:
25.57%
Market cap:
$33.5B
Revenue:
$24.8B
EPS (TTM):
$3.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $41.00 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$6.6B | -- | -- | -- | $97.31 |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$5.8B | -- | -- | -- | $104.86 |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$875.7M | $0.50 | 7.67% | 95.2% | $16.95 |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
$23.2B | -- | -- | -- | $19.30 |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$14.8B | -- | -- | -- | $70.21 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
$42.13 | $41.00 | $33.5B | 12.85x | $0.54 | 5.52% | 1.41x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$91.70 | $97.31 | $41.1B | 25.26x | $1.45 | 2.54% | 1.86x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$92.80 | $104.86 | $51.6B | 20.45x | $2.52 | 4.46% | 2.54x |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$12.70 | $16.95 | $1.9B | 8.78x | $0.17 | 5.35% | 0.58x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
$17.44 | $19.30 | $37.5B | 19.54x | $0.19 | 3.32% | 0.42x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$68.36 | $70.21 | $149.1B | 23.95x | $0.56 | 3.19% | 2.32x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
67.89% | -0.855 | -- | 0.29x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
58.46% | -0.253 | -- | 0.56x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
68.17% | -0.303 | -- | 0.61x |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
45.19% | -1.585 | 128.32% | 0.55x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
37.33% | 0.994 | -- | 0.42x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -0.634 | -- | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
-- | -- | 16.48% | 45.97% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
-- | -- | 7.77% | 17.57% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
-- | -- | 6.75% | 18.76% | -- | -- |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$242.4M | $129.1M | 4.18% | 7.59% | 14.69% | $9.1M |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
-- | -- | 8.64% | 13.9% | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -- | 18.14% | 25.84% | -- | -- |
Imperial Brands Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's return on equity of 17.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc-- -- $23.2B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.68%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has an analysts' consensus of $97.31 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 2 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc6 4 0 -
Is IMBBY or CCEP More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.685%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 78.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc pays out 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's PE ratio is 25.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.41x versus 1.86x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.41x 12.85x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc1.86x 25.26x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or DEO?
Diageo Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Diageo Plc's return on equity of 18.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B DEODiageo Plc-- -- $36.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.68%. On the other hand Diageo Plc has an analysts' consensus of $104.86 which suggests that it could grow by 12.99%. Given that Diageo Plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Diageo Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 2 0 DEODiageo Plc3 3 1 -
Is IMBBY or DEO More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo Plc has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Diageo Plc offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 78.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo Plc pays out 95.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Diageo Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Diageo Plc's PE ratio is 20.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.41x versus 2.54x for Diageo Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.41x 12.85x -- -- DEODiageo Plc2.54x 20.45x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or NOMD?
Nomad Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of 7.66%. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Nomad Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.27.57% $0.46 $5.5B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or NOMD?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.68%. On the other hand Nomad Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.95 which suggests that it could grow by 33.47%. Given that Nomad Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Nomad Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 2 0 NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.4 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or NOMD More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or NOMD?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Nomad Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 78.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods Ltd. pays out 39.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or NOMD?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of $879.2M. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods Ltd.'s net income of $67.3M. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Nomad Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.41x versus 0.58x for Nomad Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.41x 12.85x -- -- NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.0.58x 8.78x $879.2M $67.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or TSCDY?
Tesco Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Tesco Plc's return on equity of 13.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B TSCDYTesco Plc-- -- $23.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.68%. On the other hand Tesco Plc has an analysts' consensus of $19.30 which suggests that it could grow by 10.67%. Given that Tesco Plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Tesco Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 2 0 TSCDYTesco Plc0 1 0 -
Is IMBBY or TSCDY More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco Plc has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.724%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Tesco Plc offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 78.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco Plc pays out 59.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Tesco Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Tesco Plc's PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.41x versus 0.42x for Tesco Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.41x 12.85x -- -- TSCDYTesco Plc0.42x 19.54x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or UL?
Unilever Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Unilever Plc's return on equity of 25.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B ULUnilever Plc-- -- $23.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.68%. On the other hand Unilever Plc has an analysts' consensus of $70.21 which suggests that it could grow by 2.71%. Given that Unilever Plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Unilever Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 2 0 ULUnilever Plc3 1 0 -
Is IMBBY or UL More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.373, which suggesting that the stock is 62.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever Plc has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.841%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Unilever Plc offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 78.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever Plc pays out 74.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Unilever Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Unilever Plc's PE ratio is 23.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.41x versus 2.32x for Unilever Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.41x 12.85x -- -- ULUnilever Plc2.32x 23.95x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.
