Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
51
IMBBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.70
Seasonality move
:
2.01%
Day range:
$43.50 - $43.76
52-week range:
$33.65 - $45.60
Dividend yield:
4.95%
P/E ratio:
13.34x
P/S ratio:
1.46x
P/B ratio:
5.27x
Volume:
98.4K
Avg. volume:
114.5K
1-year change:
23.17%
Market cap:
$34.4B
Revenue:
$24.8B
EPS (TTM):
$3.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $41.00 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$6.1B | -- | -- | -- | $104.14 |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$5.7B | -- | -- | -- | $105.57 |
|
NWINF
Naked Wines Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
$23.2B | -- | -- | -- | $19.30 |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$14.7B | -- | -- | -- | $76.87 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
$43.70 | $41.00 | $34.4B | 13.34x | $0.54 | 4.95% | 1.46x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$105.70 | $104.14 | $47.4B | 21.82x | $1.45 | 2.21% | 2.06x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$100.37 | $105.57 | $55.8B | 20.45x | $2.52 | 4.12% | 2.75x |
|
NWINF
Naked Wines Plc
|
$1.00 | -- | $71.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
$20.17 | $19.30 | $43.3B | 22.59x | $0.19 | 2.87% | 0.49x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$73.23 | $76.87 | $160B | 23.49x | $0.56 | 2.98% | 2.84x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
67.89% | -0.904 | -- | 0.29x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
58.46% | -0.266 | -- | 0.56x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
68.17% | -0.256 | -- | 0.61x |
|
NWINF
Naked Wines Plc
|
8.59% | -1.916 | -- | 0.34x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
37.33% | 1.053 | -- | 0.42x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -0.644 | -- | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands Plc
|
-- | -- | 16.48% | 45.97% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
-- | -- | 7.77% | 17.57% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
-- | -- | 6.75% | 18.76% | -- | -- |
|
NWINF
Naked Wines Plc
|
-- | -- | -16.91% | -20.44% | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco Plc
|
-- | -- | 8.64% | 13.9% | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -- | 18.14% | 25.84% | -- | -- |
Imperial Brands Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's return on equity of 17.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc-- -- $23.2B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.18%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has an analysts' consensus of $104.14 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Imperial Brands Plc has more downside risk than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 1 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc6 4 0 -
Is IMBBY or CCEP More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.101%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 63.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc pays out 48.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.46x versus 2.06x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.46x 13.34x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc2.06x 21.82x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or DEO?
Diageo Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Diageo Plc's return on equity of 18.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B DEODiageo Plc-- -- $36.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.18%. On the other hand Diageo Plc has an analysts' consensus of $105.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that Diageo Plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Diageo Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 1 0 DEODiageo Plc3 3 1 -
Is IMBBY or DEO More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo Plc has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.262%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Diageo Plc offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 63.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo Plc pays out 95.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Diageo Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Diageo Plc's PE ratio is 20.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.46x versus 2.75x for Diageo Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.46x 13.34x -- -- DEODiageo Plc2.75x 20.45x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or NWINF?
Naked Wines Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Naked Wines Plc's return on equity of -20.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B NWINFNaked Wines Plc-- -- $98.5M -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or NWINF?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.18%. On the other hand Naked Wines Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Brands Plc has higher upside potential than Naked Wines Plc, analysts believe Imperial Brands Plc is more attractive than Naked Wines Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 1 0 NWINFNaked Wines Plc0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or NWINF More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Naked Wines Plc has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.649%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or NWINF?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Naked Wines Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 63.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Naked Wines Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or NWINF?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Naked Wines Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Naked Wines Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Naked Wines Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.46x versus 0.25x for Naked Wines Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.46x 13.34x -- -- NWINFNaked Wines Plc0.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or TSCDY?
Tesco Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Tesco Plc's return on equity of 13.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B TSCDYTesco Plc-- -- $23.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.18%. On the other hand Tesco Plc has an analysts' consensus of $19.30 which suggests that it could fall by -4.31%. Given that Imperial Brands Plc has more downside risk than Tesco Plc, analysts believe Tesco Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 1 0 TSCDYTesco Plc0 1 0 -
Is IMBBY or TSCDY More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco Plc has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.076%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Tesco Plc offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 63.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco Plc pays out 59.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Tesco Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Tesco Plc's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.46x versus 0.49x for Tesco Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.46x 13.34x -- -- TSCDYTesco Plc0.49x 22.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or UL?
Unilever Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands Plc's net margin of --. Imperial Brands Plc's return on equity of 45.97% beat Unilever Plc's return on equity of 25.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands Plc-- -- $20.7B ULUnilever Plc-- -- $23.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.18%. On the other hand Unilever Plc has an analysts' consensus of $76.87 which suggests that it could grow by 4.97%. Given that Unilever Plc has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands Plc, analysts believe Unilever Plc is more attractive than Imperial Brands Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands Plc0 1 0 ULUnilever Plc3 2 0 -
Is IMBBY or UL More Risky?
Imperial Brands Plc has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever Plc has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Unilever Plc offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Imperial Brands Plc pays 63.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever Plc pays out 72.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever Plc quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands Plc's net income of -- is lower than Unilever Plc's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Unilever Plc's PE ratio is 23.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands Plc is 1.46x versus 2.84x for Unilever Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands Plc1.46x 13.34x -- -- ULUnilever Plc2.84x 23.49x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
