Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
51
IMBBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.28
Seasonality move
:
0.34%
Day range:
$31.99 - $32.61
52-week range:
$21.30 - $33.49
Dividend yield:
5.87%
P/E ratio:
8.36x
P/S ratio:
0.68x
P/B ratio:
3.71x
Volume:
160.8K
Avg. volume:
243.8K
1-year change:
39.26%
Market cap:
$27B
Revenue:
$41.1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.86
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$5.8B | -- | -- | -- | $80.61 |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$20.8B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$16.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
$32.28 | -- | $27B | 8.36x | $0.30 | 5.87% | 0.68x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$36.24 | -- | $79.9B | -- | $0.74 | 8.29% | 2.47x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$75.15 | $80.61 | $34.6B | 19.94x | $1.30 | 2.78% | 1.68x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
$12.03 | -- | $41.4B | 22.07x | $0.21 | 4.2% | 2.39x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$14.05 | -- | $31.4B | 19.49x | $0.16 | 3.36% | 0.37x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$57.16 | -- | $141.5B | 20.18x | $0.48 | 3.27% | 2.22x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
61.51% | -0.133 | 45.86% | 0.33x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.6% | 0.632 | 73.63% | 0.57x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
57.33% | 0.330 | 36.05% | 0.57x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
51.56% | -0.515 | 28.41% | 0.46x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
38.22% | 0.898 | 36.34% | 0.30x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | 0.069 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | 17.1% | 44.78% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -13.43% | -22.5% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
-- | -- | 8.26% | 19.35% | -- | -- |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | 9.03% | 17.83% | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
-- | -- | 6.22% | 10.12% | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | -- | 21.13% | 30.02% | -- | -- |
Imperial Brands PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $119.7B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.02%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or BTI More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.486%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 8.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 2.47x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.68x 8.36x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC2.47x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 19.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $80.61 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC8 3 0 -
Is IMBBY or CCEP More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.761%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 50.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 1.68x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.68x 8.36x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC1.68x 19.94x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or RBGLY?
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC-- -- $21.1B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Imperial Brands PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or RBGLY More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.003%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or RBGLY?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 22.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 2.39x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.68x 8.36x -- -- RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC2.39x 22.07x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or TSCDY?
Tesco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Tesco PLC's return on equity of 10.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B TSCDYTesco PLC-- -- $23.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Tesco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.49%. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has higher upside potential than Tesco PLC, analysts believe Imperial Brands PLC is more attractive than Tesco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 TSCDYTesco PLC0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or TSCDY More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco PLC has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Tesco PLC offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco PLC pays out 65.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or TSCDY?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Tesco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Tesco PLC's PE ratio is 19.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 0.37x for Tesco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.68x 8.36x -- -- TSCDYTesco PLC0.37x 19.49x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or UL?
Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $19.7B ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 0 0 ULUnilever PLC0 0 0 -
Is IMBBY or UL More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.979%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.36x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 2.22x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.68x 8.36x -- -- ULUnilever PLC2.22x 20.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
