HXGCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of -49.24% compared to Hexagon Composites ASA's net margin of --. Hexagon Composites ASA's return on equity of -53.65% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hexagon Composites ASA has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Hexagon Composites ASA is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..

Hexagon Composites ASA has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hexagon Composites ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hexagon Composites ASA quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hexagon Composites ASA's net income of -$26.1M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Hexagon Composites ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon Composites ASA is 0.51x versus 0.13x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -49.24% compared to Hexagon Composites ASA's net margin of --. Hexagon Composites ASA's return on equity of -53.65% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hexagon Composites ASA has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Hexagon Composites ASA is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hexagon Composites ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hexagon Composites ASA quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Hexagon Composites ASA's net income of -$26.1M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Hexagon Composites ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon Composites ASA is 0.51x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Elopak ASA has a net margin of -49.24% compared to Hexagon Composites ASA's net margin of 6.28%. Hexagon Composites ASA's return on equity of -53.65% beat Elopak ASA's return on equity of 15.04%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elopak ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hexagon Composites ASA has higher upside potential than Elopak ASA, analysts believe Hexagon Composites ASA is more attractive than Elopak ASA.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elopak ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elopak ASA offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Hexagon Composites ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elopak ASA pays out 59.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Elopak ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hexagon Composites ASA quarterly revenues are $53M, which are smaller than Elopak ASA quarterly revenues of $338.5M. Hexagon Composites ASA's net income of -$26.1M is lower than Elopak ASA's net income of $21.3M. Notably, Hexagon Composites ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elopak ASA's PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon Composites ASA is 0.51x versus 0.93x for Elopak ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kongsberg Automotive ASA has a net margin of -49.24% compared to Hexagon Composites ASA's net margin of 0.98%. Hexagon Composites ASA's return on equity of -53.65% beat Kongsberg Automotive ASA's return on equity of -7.83%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kongsberg Automotive ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hexagon Composites ASA has higher upside potential than Kongsberg Automotive ASA, analysts believe Hexagon Composites ASA is more attractive than Kongsberg Automotive ASA.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kongsberg Automotive ASA has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.401%.

Hexagon Composites ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kongsberg Automotive ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hexagon Composites ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kongsberg Automotive ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hexagon Composites ASA quarterly revenues are $53M, which are smaller than Kongsberg Automotive ASA quarterly revenues of $190.4M. Hexagon Composites ASA's net income of -$26.1M is lower than Kongsberg Automotive ASA's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Hexagon Composites ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kongsberg Automotive ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon Composites ASA is 0.51x versus 0.23x for Kongsberg Automotive ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.