GULTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mexco Energy Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net margin of 18.65%. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Mexco Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 9.05%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mexco Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy Corp., analysts believe Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust is more attractive than Mexco Energy Corp..

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a beta of -0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 118.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.89%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp. pays out 12.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mexco Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net income of -- is lower than Mexco Energy Corp.'s net income of $323.5K. Notably, Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33,450.00x while Mexco Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust is 4.06x versus 2.90x for Mexco Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PEDEVCO Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net margin of -4.67%. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat PEDEVCO Corp.'s return on equity of 3.5%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PEDEVCO Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 49.65%. Given that PEDEVCO Corp. has higher upside potential than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust, analysts believe PEDEVCO Corp. is more attractive than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a beta of -0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 118.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PEDEVCO Corp. has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.317%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PEDEVCO Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PEDEVCO Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PEDEVCO Corp. quarterly revenues of $7M. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net income of -- is higher than PEDEVCO Corp.'s net income of -$325K. Notably, Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33,450.00x while PEDEVCO Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust is 4.06x versus 1.55x for PEDEVCO Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net margin of -65.69%. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Ring Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ring Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 184.41%. Given that Ring Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust, analysts believe Ring Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a beta of -0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 118.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.481%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ring Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ring Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.6M. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net income of -- is higher than Ring Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33,450.00x while Ring Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust is 4.06x versus 0.55x for Ring Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net margin of 15.29%. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's return on equity of -- beat Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.15%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.59%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is more attractive than Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a beta of -0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 118.48% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.163%.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. pays out 33.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $106.9M. Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's net income of -- is lower than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33,450.00x while Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust is 4.06x versus 1.41x for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.