GRNWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. has a net margin of 0.14% compared to Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net margin of 6.6%. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.05% beat Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.92%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 269.76%. Given that Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. has higher upside potential than Greenlane Renewables, Inc., analysts believe Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. is more attractive than Greenlane Renewables, Inc..

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.32%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Renewables, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. quarterly revenues of $14.8M. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net income of $11.6K is lower than Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.'s net income of $976K. Notably, Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.25x while Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Renewables, Inc. is 0.94x versus 0.82x for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuburu, has a net margin of 0.14% compared to Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net margin of -25746.56%. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.05% beat Nuburu,'s return on equity of --.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuburu, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuburu,, analysts believe Greenlane Renewables, Inc. is more attractive than Nuburu,.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuburu, has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuburu, offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Renewables, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuburu, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Nuburu, quarterly revenues of --. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net income of $11.6K is higher than Nuburu,'s net income of -$22.4M. Notably, Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.25x while Nuburu,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Renewables, Inc. is 0.94x versus 1,265.26x for Nuburu,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 0.14% compared to Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net margin of -2553.07%. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.05% beat Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.27%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 341.18%. Given that Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greenlane Renewables, Inc., analysts believe Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Greenlane Renewables, Inc..

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.132%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Renewables, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $424K. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net income of $11.6K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.25x while Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Renewables, Inc. is 0.94x versus 15.32x for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 0.14% compared to Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net margin of 14.95%. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.05% beat SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.15%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 76.75%. Given that SIFCO Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greenlane Renewables, Inc., analysts believe SIFCO Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Greenlane Renewables, Inc..

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.961%.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Renewables, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Renewables, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.1M. Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s net income of $11.6K is lower than SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M. Notably, Greenlane Renewables, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.25x while SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Renewables, Inc. is 0.94x versus 0.51x for SIFCO Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.