GLFGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ardagh Metal Packaging SA has a net margin of -- compared to Global Fashion Group SA's net margin of 1.89%. Global Fashion Group SA's return on equity of -33.02% beat Ardagh Metal Packaging SA's return on equity of -90.91%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ardagh Metal Packaging SA has an analysts' consensus of $4.30 which suggests that it could grow by 4.37%. Given that Ardagh Metal Packaging SA has higher upside potential than Global Fashion Group SA, analysts believe Ardagh Metal Packaging SA is more attractive than Global Fashion Group SA.

Global Fashion Group SA has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ardagh Metal Packaging SA has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.172%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ardagh Metal Packaging SA offers a yield of 12.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global Fashion Group SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ardagh Metal Packaging SA pays out 8800% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Fashion Group SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ardagh Metal Packaging SA quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Global Fashion Group SA's net income of -- is lower than Ardagh Metal Packaging SA's net income of $27M. Notably, Global Fashion Group SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ardagh Metal Packaging SA's PE ratio is 10.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Fashion Group SA is 0.09x versus 0.46x for Ardagh Metal Packaging SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Global Fashion Group SA's net margin of 3.15%. Global Fashion Group SA's return on equity of -33.02% beat Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.38%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Fashion Group SA has higher upside potential than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Global Fashion Group SA is more attractive than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc..

Global Fashion Group SA has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.945%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Global Fashion Group SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. pays out 20.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Fashion Group SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $49.2M. Global Fashion Group SA's net income of -- is lower than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Global Fashion Group SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Fashion Group SA is 0.09x versus 0.28x for Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Codere Online Luxembourg SA has a net margin of -- compared to Global Fashion Group SA's net margin of 2.94%. Global Fashion Group SA's return on equity of -33.02% beat Codere Online Luxembourg SA's return on equity of 21.84%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Codere Online Luxembourg SA has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.65%. Given that Codere Online Luxembourg SA has higher upside potential than Global Fashion Group SA, analysts believe Codere Online Luxembourg SA is more attractive than Global Fashion Group SA.

Global Fashion Group SA has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Codere Online Luxembourg SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Codere Online Luxembourg SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Fashion Group SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Codere Online Luxembourg SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Fashion Group SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Codere Online Luxembourg SA quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Global Fashion Group SA's net income of -- is lower than Codere Online Luxembourg SA's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Global Fashion Group SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Codere Online Luxembourg SA's PE ratio is 68.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Fashion Group SA is 0.09x versus 1.64x for Codere Online Luxembourg SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

tonies SE has a net margin of -- compared to Global Fashion Group SA's net margin of --. Global Fashion Group SA's return on equity of -33.02% beat tonies SE's return on equity of -8.93%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand tonies SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Fashion Group SA has higher upside potential than tonies SE, analysts believe Global Fashion Group SA is more attractive than tonies SE.

Global Fashion Group SA has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison tonies SE has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Fashion Group SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. tonies SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Fashion Group SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. tonies SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Fashion Group SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than tonies SE quarterly revenues of --. Global Fashion Group SA's net income of -- is lower than tonies SE's net income of --. Notably, Global Fashion Group SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while tonies SE's PE ratio is 50.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Fashion Group SA is 0.09x versus 2.66x for tonies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.