GFMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse Corp. has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of -44.87%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cineverse Corp.'s return on equity of -2.95%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cineverse Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 206.12%. Given that Cineverse Corp. has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Cineverse Corp. is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.250, which suggesting that the stock is 74.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse Corp. has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.127%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cineverse Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$23.4K is higher than Cineverse Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Cineverse Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is 13.32x versus 0.55x for Cineverse Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everlert, Inc. has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of --. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Everlert, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everlert, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goliath Film & Media Holdings has higher upside potential than Everlert, Inc., analysts believe Goliath Film & Media Holdings is more attractive than Everlert, Inc..

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.250, which suggesting that the stock is 74.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everlert, Inc. has a beta of -110.220, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11122.009%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everlert, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everlert, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Everlert, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$23.4K is higher than Everlert, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Everlert, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is 13.32x versus -- for Everlert, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 2.9%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could fall by -1.36%. Given that Paramount Skydance Corp. has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Skydance Corp. is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.250, which suggesting that the stock is 74.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$23.4K is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is 13.32x versus 0.40x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 9.54%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.25%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $222.63 which suggests that it could grow by 14.23%. Given that TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.250, which suggesting that the stock is 74.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.291%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TKO Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TKO Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TKO Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$23.4K is lower than TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is 13.32x versus 8.44x for TKO Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.