FRTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IDT Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net margin of 7.47%. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s return on equity of -- beat IDT Corp.'s return on equity of 27.7%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDT Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.52%. Given that IDT Corp. has higher upside potential than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina), analysts believe IDT Corp. is more attractive than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina).

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a beta of 0.374, which suggesting that the stock is 62.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT Corp. has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.044%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDT Corp. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDT Corp. pays out 7.31% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IDT Corp. quarterly revenues of $322.8M. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net income of -- is lower than IDT Corp.'s net income of $24.1M. Notably, Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while IDT Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) is 2.07x versus 1.00x for IDT Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KonaTel, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net margin of -2.08%. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s return on equity of -- beat KonaTel, Inc.'s return on equity of -186.8%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KonaTel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has higher upside potential than KonaTel, Inc., analysts believe Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) is more attractive than KonaTel, Inc..

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a beta of 0.374, which suggesting that the stock is 62.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KonaTel, Inc. has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.396%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KonaTel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KonaTel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KonaTel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net income of -- is lower than KonaTel, Inc.'s net income of -$45.1K. Notably, Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while KonaTel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) is 2.07x versus 1.08x for KonaTel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) has a net margin of -- compared to Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net margin of -24.37%. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s return on equity of -- beat KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware)'s return on equity of -8.73%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.38%. Given that KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) has higher upside potential than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina), analysts believe KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) is more attractive than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina).

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a beta of 0.374, which suggesting that the stock is 62.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.246%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware) quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net income of -- is lower than KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware)'s net income of -$6.9M. Notably, Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) is 2.07x versus 1.11x for KVH Industries, Inc. (Delaware). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has a net margin of -- compared to Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net margin of -0.07%. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s return on equity of -- beat Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s return on equity of -610.25%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has an analysts' consensus of $7.64 which suggests that it could fall by -4.81%. Given that Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has higher upside potential than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina), analysts believe Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) is more attractive than Fortran Corp. (North Carolina).

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a beta of 0.374, which suggesting that the stock is 62.65% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.441%.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) pays out 5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) quarterly revenues of $3B. Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s net income of -- is lower than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Fortran Corp. (North Carolina)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortran Corp. (North Carolina) is 2.07x versus 0.64x for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.