FLUIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of -- compared to Fluidra SA's net margin of --. Fluidra SA's return on equity of 7.55% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Fluidra SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Fluidra SA, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Fluidra SA.

Fluidra SA has a beta of 0.806, which suggesting that the stock is 19.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.815%.

Fluidra SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Fluidra SA pays 117.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 29.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fluidra SA's is not.

Fluidra SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Fluidra SA's net income of -- is lower than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Fluidra SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.70x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluidra SA is 2.04x versus 3.23x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA has a net margin of -- compared to Fluidra SA's net margin of --. Fluidra SA's return on equity of 7.55% beat Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's return on equity of --.

Fluidra SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fluidra SA has higher upside potential than Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA, analysts believe Fluidra SA is more attractive than Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA.

Fluidra SA has a beta of 0.806, which suggesting that the stock is 19.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluidra SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Fluidra SA pays 117.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA pays out 3.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fluidra SA's is not.

Fluidra SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA quarterly revenues of --. Fluidra SA's net income of -- is lower than Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's net income of $113.6M. Notably, Fluidra SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.70x while Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's PE ratio is 8.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluidra SA is 2.04x versus 0.45x for Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Consolidated Airlines Group SA has a net margin of -- compared to Fluidra SA's net margin of 15.38%. Fluidra SA's return on equity of 7.55% beat International Consolidated Airlines Group SA's return on equity of 94.97%.

Fluidra SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand International Consolidated Airlines Group SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fluidra SA has higher upside potential than International Consolidated Airlines Group SA, analysts believe Fluidra SA is more attractive than International Consolidated Airlines Group SA.

Fluidra SA has a beta of 0.806, which suggesting that the stock is 19.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Consolidated Airlines Group SA has a beta of 2.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.353%.

Fluidra SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. International Consolidated Airlines Group SA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Fluidra SA pays 117.52% of its earnings as a dividend. International Consolidated Airlines Group SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluidra SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than International Consolidated Airlines Group SA quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Fluidra SA's net income of -- is lower than International Consolidated Airlines Group SA's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Fluidra SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.70x while International Consolidated Airlines Group SA's PE ratio is 5.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluidra SA is 2.04x versus 0.52x for International Consolidated Airlines Group SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecnicas Reunidas SA has a net margin of -- compared to Fluidra SA's net margin of --. Fluidra SA's return on equity of 7.55% beat Tecnicas Reunidas SA's return on equity of --.

Fluidra SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tecnicas Reunidas SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fluidra SA has higher upside potential than Tecnicas Reunidas SA, analysts believe Fluidra SA is more attractive than Tecnicas Reunidas SA.

Fluidra SA has a beta of 0.806, which suggesting that the stock is 19.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecnicas Reunidas SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluidra SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Tecnicas Reunidas SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluidra SA pays 117.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnicas Reunidas SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluidra SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tecnicas Reunidas SA quarterly revenues of --. Fluidra SA's net income of -- is lower than Tecnicas Reunidas SA's net income of --. Notably, Fluidra SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.70x while Tecnicas Reunidas SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluidra SA is 2.04x versus 0.14x for Tecnicas Reunidas SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.