3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Buy
59
FLIDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.88
Seasonality move
:
-2.91%
Day range:
$4.88 - $4.88
52-week range:
$3.98 - $5.57
Dividend yield:
1.17%
P/E ratio:
27.86x
P/S ratio:
0.92x
P/B ratio:
1.67x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
22%
Market cap:
$2.8B
Revenue:
$3.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLIDY
FLSmidth & Co AS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
$14B | $0.43 | 18.19% | 538.31% | -- |
|
CDLR
Cadeler AS
|
$86.1M | $0.28 | 358.46% | 3247.22% | $34.50 |
|
DSDVY
DSV AS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
$3.8M | -$0.37 | 8.15% | -57.02% | $4.60 |
|
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems AS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLIDY
FLSmidth & Co AS
|
$4.88 | -- | $2.8B | 27.86x | $0.06 | 1.17% | 0.92x |
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
$8.43 | -- | $26.5B | 7.27x | $0.33 | 8.4% | 0.51x |
|
CDLR
Cadeler AS
|
$22.69 | $34.50 | $2B | 249.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 9.81x |
|
DSDVY
DSV AS
|
$107.94 | -- | $50.5B | 28.82x | $0.51 | 0.47% | 1.95x |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
$2.04 | $4.60 | $19.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems AS
|
$4.81 | -- | $14.6B | 257.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.83x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLIDY
FLSmidth & Co AS
|
17.64% | 0.082 | 12.83% | 0.60x |
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
8.98% | -0.414 | 20% | 2.41x |
|
CDLR
Cadeler AS
|
33.84% | 0.897 | 26.19% | 1.65x |
|
DSDVY
DSV AS
|
25.18% | 0.311 | 8.44% | 1.18x |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
31.04% | 1.494 | 34.41% | 1.57x |
|
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems AS
|
53.36% | 0.245 | 16.74% | 0.49x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLIDY
FLSmidth & Co AS
|
$246.4M | $76.5M | 5.15% | 6.19% | 13.4% | $17.2M |
|
AMKBY
A P Moller Maersk AS
|
-- | -- | 6% | 6.55% | 20.67% | $3.3B |
|
CDLR
Cadeler AS
|
$52.2M | $36.5M | 0.65% | 0.95% | 39.06% | -$254.6M |
|
DSDVY
DSV AS
|
$1.6B | $651.4M | 11.46% | 15.34% | 9.9% | $581.4M |
|
LIQT
LiqTech International
|
-$209.5K | -$2.6M | -53.31% | -70.55% | -107.3% | -$2.1M |
|
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems AS
|
$598.3M | $257.4M | 0.8% | 1.7% | 4.52% | -$210.6M |
FLSmidth & Co AS vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLIDY or AMKBY?
A P Moller Maersk AS has a net margin of 5.67% compared to FLSmidth & Co AS's net margin of 19.34%. FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 6.19% beat A P Moller Maersk AS's return on equity of 6.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS33.05% $0.07 $2B AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS-- $0.97 $62B -
What do Analysts Say About FLIDY or AMKBY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand A P Moller Maersk AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.58%. Given that A P Moller Maersk AS has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co AS, analysts believe A P Moller Maersk AS is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0 0 0 AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0 0 0 -
Is FLIDY or AMKBY More Risky?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A P Moller Maersk AS has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLIDY or AMKBY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. A P Moller Maersk AS offers a yield of 8.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. FLSmidth & Co AS pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. A P Moller Maersk AS pays out 284.56% of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but A P Moller Maersk AS's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLIDY or AMKBY?
FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues are $745.6M, which are smaller than A P Moller Maersk AS quarterly revenues of $15.8B. FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $42.3M is lower than A P Moller Maersk AS's net income of $3B. Notably, FLSmidth & Co AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.86x while A P Moller Maersk AS's PE ratio is 7.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co AS is 0.92x versus 0.51x for A P Moller Maersk AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0.92x 27.86x $745.6M $42.3M AMKBYA P Moller Maersk AS0.51x 7.27x $15.8B $3B
-
Which has Higher Returns FLIDY or CDLR?
Cadeler AS has a net margin of 5.67% compared to FLSmidth & Co AS's net margin of 34.34%. FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 6.19% beat Cadeler AS's return on equity of 0.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS33.05% $0.07 $2B CDLRCadeler AS58.92% $0.35 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About FLIDY or CDLR?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cadeler AS has an analysts' consensus of $34.50 which suggests that it could grow by 52.05%. Given that Cadeler AS has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co AS, analysts believe Cadeler AS is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0 0 0 CDLRCadeler AS2 0 0 -
Is FLIDY or CDLR More Risky?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadeler AS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLIDY or CDLR?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Cadeler AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co AS pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadeler AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLIDY or CDLR?
FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues are $745.6M, which are larger than Cadeler AS quarterly revenues of $88.6M. FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $42.3M is higher than Cadeler AS's net income of $30.4M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.86x while Cadeler AS's PE ratio is 249.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co AS is 0.92x versus 9.81x for Cadeler AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0.92x 27.86x $745.6M $42.3M CDLRCadeler AS9.81x 249.51x $88.6M $30.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLIDY or DSDVY?
DSV AS has a net margin of 5.67% compared to FLSmidth & Co AS's net margin of 6.4%. FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 6.19% beat DSV AS's return on equity of 15.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS33.05% $0.07 $2B DSDVYDSV AS25.13% $1.00 $14.4B -
What do Analysts Say About FLIDY or DSDVY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DSV AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co AS has higher upside potential than DSV AS, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co AS is more attractive than DSV AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0 0 0 DSDVYDSV AS0 0 0 -
Is FLIDY or DSDVY More Risky?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DSV AS has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLIDY or DSDVY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. DSV AS offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. FLSmidth & Co AS pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. DSV AS pays out 11.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLIDY or DSDVY?
FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues are $745.6M, which are smaller than DSV AS quarterly revenues of $6.5B. FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $42.3M is lower than DSV AS's net income of $416M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.86x while DSV AS's PE ratio is 28.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co AS is 0.92x versus 1.95x for DSV AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0.92x 27.86x $745.6M $42.3M DSDVYDSV AS1.95x 28.82x $6.5B $416M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLIDY or LIQT?
LiqTech International has a net margin of 5.67% compared to FLSmidth & Co AS's net margin of -114.62%. FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 6.19% beat LiqTech International's return on equity of -70.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS33.05% $0.07 $2B LIQTLiqTech International-8.46% -$0.49 $16.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FLIDY or LIQT?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LiqTech International has an analysts' consensus of $4.60 which suggests that it could grow by 125.49%. Given that LiqTech International has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co AS, analysts believe LiqTech International is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0 0 0 LIQTLiqTech International2 0 0 -
Is FLIDY or LIQT More Risky?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.42500000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLIDY or LIQT?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. LiqTech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co AS pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLIDY or LIQT?
FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues are $745.6M, which are larger than LiqTech International quarterly revenues of $2.5M. FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $42.3M is higher than LiqTech International's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.86x while LiqTech International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co AS is 0.92x versus 0.78x for LiqTech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0.92x 27.86x $745.6M $42.3M LIQTLiqTech International0.78x -- $2.5M -$2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns FLIDY or VWDRY?
Vestas Wind Systems AS has a net margin of 5.67% compared to FLSmidth & Co AS's net margin of 2.45%. FLSmidth & Co AS's return on equity of 6.19% beat Vestas Wind Systems AS's return on equity of 1.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS33.05% $0.07 $2B VWDRYVestas Wind Systems AS10.51% $0.05 $7B -
What do Analysts Say About FLIDY or VWDRY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vestas Wind Systems AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co AS has higher upside potential than Vestas Wind Systems AS, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co AS is more attractive than Vestas Wind Systems AS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0 0 0 VWDRYVestas Wind Systems AS0 0 0 -
Is FLIDY or VWDRY More Risky?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.619% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vestas Wind Systems AS has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLIDY or VWDRY?
FLSmidth & Co AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Vestas Wind Systems AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co AS pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Vestas Wind Systems AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLIDY or VWDRY?
FLSmidth & Co AS quarterly revenues are $745.6M, which are smaller than Vestas Wind Systems AS quarterly revenues of $5.7B. FLSmidth & Co AS's net income of $42.3M is lower than Vestas Wind Systems AS's net income of $139.7M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.86x while Vestas Wind Systems AS's PE ratio is 257.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co AS is 0.92x versus 0.83x for Vestas Wind Systems AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLIDYFLSmidth & Co AS0.92x 27.86x $745.6M $42.3M VWDRYVestas Wind Systems AS0.83x 257.01x $5.7B $139.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.
