FLIDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ISS A/S has a net margin of -3.78% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of --. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 6.92% beat ISS A/S's return on equity of 23.26%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ISS A/S has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co. A/S has higher upside potential than ISS A/S, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co. A/S is more attractive than ISS A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 112.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ISS A/S has a beta of -0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.971%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. ISS A/S offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. ISS A/S pays out 21.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $634.8M, which are larger than ISS A/S quarterly revenues of --. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of -$24M is higher than ISS A/S's net income of --. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.28x while ISS A/S's PE ratio is 12.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 2.17x versus 0.40x for ISS A/S. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiqTech International, Inc. has a net margin of -3.78% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of -38.34%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 6.92% beat LiqTech International, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.31%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LiqTech International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could grow by 172.73%. Given that LiqTech International, Inc. has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co. A/S, analysts believe LiqTech International, Inc. is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co. A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 112.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.131%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. LiqTech International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $634.8M, which are larger than LiqTech International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of -$24M is lower than LiqTech International, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.28x while LiqTech International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 2.17x versus 0.84x for LiqTech International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

has a net margin of -3.78% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of 16.2%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 6.92% beat 's return on equity of 18%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co. A/S has higher upside potential than , analysts believe FLSmidth & Co. A/S is more attractive than .

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 112.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.87%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out 25.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $634.8M, which are smaller than quarterly revenues of $1.1B. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of -$24M is lower than 's net income of $170.5M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.28x while 's PE ratio is 18.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 2.17x versus 0.02x for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a net margin of -3.78% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of 6.97%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 6.92% beat Vestas Wind Systems A/S's return on equity of 23.14%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vestas Wind Systems A/S has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co. A/S has higher upside potential than Vestas Wind Systems A/S, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co. A/S is more attractive than Vestas Wind Systems A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 112.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.983%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Vestas Wind Systems A/S offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Vestas Wind Systems A/S pays out 9.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $634.8M, which are smaller than Vestas Wind Systems A/S quarterly revenues of $7.3B. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of -$24M is lower than Vestas Wind Systems A/S's net income of $508.6M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.28x while Vestas Wind Systems A/S's PE ratio is 27.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 2.17x versus 1.18x for Vestas Wind Systems A/S. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.