FLIDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadeler A/S has a net margin of 8.63% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of 41.89%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 11.37% beat Cadeler A/S's return on equity of 21.28%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cadeler A/S has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.15%. Given that Cadeler A/S has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co. A/S, analysts believe Cadeler A/S is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co. A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadeler A/S has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Cadeler A/S offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadeler A/S pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $540.6M, which are larger than Cadeler A/S quarterly revenues of $180.2M. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of $46.7M is lower than Cadeler A/S's net income of $75.5M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.74x while Cadeler A/S's PE ratio is 5.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 1.68x versus 2.84x for Cadeler A/S. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DSV A/S has a net margin of 8.63% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of 3%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 11.37% beat DSV A/S's return on equity of 8.88%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DSV A/S has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co. A/S has higher upside potential than DSV A/S, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co. A/S is more attractive than DSV A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DSV A/S has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.695%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. DSV A/S offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. DSV A/S pays out 8.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $540.6M, which are smaller than DSV A/S quarterly revenues of $11.3B. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of $46.7M is lower than DSV A/S's net income of $338.2M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.74x while DSV A/S's PE ratio is 43.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 1.68x versus 1.85x for DSV A/S. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiqTech International, Inc. has a net margin of 8.63% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of -38.34%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 11.37% beat LiqTech International, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.31%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LiqTech International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could grow by 162.5%. Given that LiqTech International, Inc. has higher upside potential than FLSmidth & Co. A/S, analysts believe LiqTech International, Inc. is more attractive than FLSmidth & Co. A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International, Inc. has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.267%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. LiqTech International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $540.6M, which are larger than LiqTech International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of $46.7M is higher than LiqTech International, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.74x while LiqTech International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 1.68x versus 0.87x for LiqTech International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a net margin of 8.63% compared to FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net margin of 5.69%. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's return on equity of 11.37% beat Vestas Wind Systems A/S's return on equity of 28.31%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vestas Wind Systems A/S has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FLSmidth & Co. A/S has higher upside potential than Vestas Wind Systems A/S, analysts believe FLSmidth & Co. A/S is more attractive than Vestas Wind Systems A/S.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a beta of -0.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.396%.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Vestas Wind Systems A/S offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. FLSmidth & Co. A/S pays 23.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Vestas Wind Systems A/S pays out 9.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FLSmidth & Co. A/S quarterly revenues are $540.6M, which are smaller than Vestas Wind Systems A/S quarterly revenues of $6.2B. FLSmidth & Co. A/S's net income of $46.7M is lower than Vestas Wind Systems A/S's net income of $355.2M. Notably, FLSmidth & Co. A/S's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.74x while Vestas Wind Systems A/S's PE ratio is 26.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FLSmidth & Co. A/S is 1.68x versus 1.30x for Vestas Wind Systems A/S. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.