FANUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of -- compared to Fanuc's net margin of 6.75%. Fanuc's return on equity of -- beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Fanuc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Fanuc, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Fanuc.

Fanuc has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.912%.

Fanuc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fanuc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fanuc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Fanuc's net income of -- is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Fanuc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fanuc is 3.84x versus 0.64x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of -- compared to Fanuc's net margin of -3.6%. Fanuc's return on equity of -- beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Fanuc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.57 which suggests that it could fall by -3.08%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Fanuc, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Fanuc.

Fanuc has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.954%.

Fanuc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Fanuc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fanuc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Fanuc's net income of -- is lower than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Fanuc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kyocera's PE ratio is 53.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fanuc is 3.84x versus 1.24x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of -- compared to Fanuc's net margin of --. Fanuc's return on equity of -- beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Fanuc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fanuc has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Fanuc is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Fanuc has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fanuc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fanuc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fanuc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Fanuc's net income of -- is lower than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Fanuc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fanuc is 3.84x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of -- compared to Fanuc's net margin of 9.53%. Fanuc's return on equity of -- beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

Fanuc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fanuc has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Fanuc is more attractive than SECOM.

Fanuc has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.489, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.125%.

Fanuc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fanuc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fanuc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Fanuc's net income of -- is lower than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Fanuc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SECOM's PE ratio is 22.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fanuc is 3.84x versus 2.98x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.