EESE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BioLargo, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net margin of -656.75%. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat BioLargo, Inc.'s return on equity of -242.01%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BioLargo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.32 which suggests that it could grow by 80.56%. Given that BioLargo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc., analysts believe BioLargo, Inc. is more attractive than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc..

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of -0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 151.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BioLargo, Inc. has a beta of -0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.485%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BioLargo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BioLargo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BioLargo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than BioLargo, Inc.'s net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BioLargo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. is 0.26x versus 4.98x for BioLargo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J.G. Boswell Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net margin of --. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat J.G. Boswell Co.'s return on equity of --.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand J.G. Boswell Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than J.G. Boswell Co., analysts believe Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. is more attractive than J.G. Boswell Co..

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of -0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 151.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J.G. Boswell Co. has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.014%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. J.G. Boswell Co. offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.G. Boswell Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than J.G. Boswell Co. quarterly revenues of --. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than J.G. Boswell Co.'s net income of --. Notably, Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while J.G. Boswell Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. is 0.26x versus -- for J.G. Boswell Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net margin of 7.04%. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s return on equity of -37.45%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intrepid Potash, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could fall by -33.3%. Given that Intrepid Potash, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc., analysts believe Intrepid Potash, Inc. is more attractive than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc..

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of -0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 151.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrepid Potash, Inc. has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.568%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intrepid Potash, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intrepid Potash, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intrepid Potash, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.2M. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intrepid Potash, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. is 0.26x versus 1.69x for Intrepid Potash, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Olin Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net margin of -5.14%. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Olin Corp.'s return on equity of -2.18%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Olin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.27 which suggests that it could fall by -8.56%. Given that Olin Corp. has higher upside potential than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc., analysts believe Olin Corp. is more attractive than Energy & Environmental Services, Inc..

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of -0.515, which suggesting that the stock is 151.459% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Olin Corp. has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.368%.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Olin Corp. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Olin Corp. pays out 88.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Olin Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Olin Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Olin Corp.'s net income of -$85.5M. Notably, Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Olin Corp.'s PE ratio is 48.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy & Environmental Services, Inc. is 0.26x versus 0.41x for Olin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.