ECTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy Corp. has a net margin of 52.25% compared to ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margin of -3115.6%. ECA Marcellus Trust I's return on equity of 14.77% beat Houston American Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -193.98%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Houston American Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy Corp., analysts believe ECA Marcellus Trust I is more attractive than Houston American Energy Corp..

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.645%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.31%. Houston American Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECA Marcellus Trust I pays 124.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECA Marcellus Trust I quarterly revenues are $661.6K, which are larger than Houston American Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $225.7K. ECA Marcellus Trust I's net income of $345.7K is higher than Houston American Energy Corp.'s net income of -$7M. Notably, ECA Marcellus Trust I's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Houston American Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECA Marcellus Trust I is 2.87x versus 55.30x for Houston American Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy Corp. has a net margin of 52.25% compared to ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margin of 18.65%. ECA Marcellus Trust I's return on equity of 14.77% beat Mexco Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 9.05%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mexco Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy Corp., analysts believe ECA Marcellus Trust I is more attractive than Mexco Energy Corp..

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.89%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.31%. Mexco Energy Corp. offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ECA Marcellus Trust I pays 124.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECA Marcellus Trust I quarterly revenues are $661.6K, which are smaller than Mexco Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. ECA Marcellus Trust I's net income of $345.7K is higher than Mexco Energy Corp.'s net income of $323.5K. Notably, ECA Marcellus Trust I's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Mexco Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECA Marcellus Trust I is 2.87x versus 2.55x for Mexco Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 52.25% compared to ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margin of -65.69%. ECA Marcellus Trust I's return on equity of 14.77% beat Ring Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ring Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 165.79%. Given that Ring Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than ECA Marcellus Trust I, analysts believe Ring Energy, Inc. is more attractive than ECA Marcellus Trust I.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.481%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.31%. Ring Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECA Marcellus Trust I pays 124.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECA Marcellus Trust I quarterly revenues are $661.6K, which are smaller than Ring Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.6M. ECA Marcellus Trust I's net income of $345.7K is higher than Ring Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$51.6M. Notably, ECA Marcellus Trust I's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Ring Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECA Marcellus Trust I is 2.87x versus 0.59x for Ring Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a net margin of 52.25% compared to ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margin of 15.29%. ECA Marcellus Trust I's return on equity of 14.77% beat Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.15%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.47%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has higher upside potential than ECA Marcellus Trust I, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is more attractive than ECA Marcellus Trust I.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 0.082, which suggesting that the stock is 91.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.163%.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 19.31%. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ECA Marcellus Trust I pays 124.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. pays out 33.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but ECA Marcellus Trust I's is not.

ECA Marcellus Trust I quarterly revenues are $661.6K, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $106.9M. ECA Marcellus Trust I's net income of $345.7K is lower than Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, ECA Marcellus Trust I's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.24x while Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECA Marcellus Trust I is 2.87x versus 1.48x for Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.