Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
60
CWGYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0600
Seasonality move
:
20.43%
Day range:
$0.0573 - $0.0573
52-week range:
$0.0100 - $0.1300
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
53.63x
P/S ratio:
102.41x
P/B ratio:
1.18x
Volume:
2.8K
Avg. volume:
18.7K
1-year change:
129.32%
Market cap:
$21M
Revenue:
$205.5K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWGYF
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AGLNF
AGL Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
APAJF
APA Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWCLF
Energy World Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FRHYF
Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OGFGY
Origin Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWGYF
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0573 | -- | $21M | 53.63x | $0.00 | 0% | 102.41x |
|
AGLNF
AGL Energy Ltd.
|
$6.06 | -- | $4.1B | 28.70x | $0.15 | 0% | 0.44x |
|
APAJF
APA Group
|
$6.07 | -- | $7.9B | 124.55x | $0.20 | 0% | 3.82x |
|
EWCLF
Energy World Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.0300 | -- | $92.4M | 0.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 11.91x |
|
FRHYF
Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)
|
$0.15 | -- | $76.3M | 51.86x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OGFGY
Origin Energy Ltd.
|
$7.68 | -- | $13.2B | 13.69x | $0.19 | 4.99% | 1.19x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWGYF
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.
|
8.64% | 5.356 | -- | 3.52x |
|
AGLNF
AGL Energy Ltd.
|
34.81% | 0.567 | -- | 0.73x |
|
APAJF
APA Group
|
83.79% | -0.022 | -- | 1.01x |
|
EWCLF
Energy World Corp. Ltd.
|
59.21% | 13.698 | 1431.68% | 0.60x |
|
FRHYF
Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)
|
-- | 0.308 | -- | -- |
|
OGFGY
Origin Energy Ltd.
|
28.63% | 0.441 | -- | 0.85x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWGYF
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -11.28% | -11.63% | -- | -- |
|
AGLNF
AGL Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.87% | 4.29% | -- | -- |
|
APAJF
APA Group
|
-- | -- | -0.28% | -1.43% | -- | -- |
|
EWCLF
Energy World Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 28.09% | 55.44% | -- | -- |
|
FRHYF
Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OGFGY
Origin Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 15.53% | 21.11% | -- | -- |
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWGYF or AGLNF?
AGL Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.63% beat AGL Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $13.9M AGLNFAGL Energy Ltd.-- -- $5B -
What do Analysts Say About CWGYF or AGLNF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGL Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than AGL Energy Ltd., analysts believe Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than AGL Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 AGLNFAGL Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CWGYF or AGLNF More Risky?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGL Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.992%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWGYF or AGLNF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AGL Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGL Energy Ltd. pays out 397.96% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWGYF or AGLNF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGL Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than AGL Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.63x while AGL Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 28.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is 102.41x versus 0.44x for AGL Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.102.41x 53.63x -- -- AGLNFAGL Energy Ltd.0.44x 28.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWGYF or APAJF?
APA Group has a net margin of -- compared to Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.63% beat APA Group's return on equity of -1.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $13.9M APAJFAPA Group-- -- $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CWGYF or APAJF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand APA Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than APA Group, analysts believe Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than APA Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 APAJFAPA Group0 0 0 -
Is CWGYF or APAJF More Risky?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APA Group has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWGYF or APAJF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. APA Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. APA Group pays out 745.76% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWGYF or APAJF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than APA Group quarterly revenues of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than APA Group's net income of --. Notably, Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.63x while APA Group's PE ratio is 124.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is 102.41x versus 3.82x for APA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.102.41x 53.63x -- -- APAJFAPA Group3.82x 124.55x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWGYF or EWCLF?
Energy World Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.63% beat Energy World Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 55.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $13.9M EWCLFEnergy World Corp. Ltd.-- -- $757.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CWGYF or EWCLF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy World Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Energy World Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Energy World Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 EWCLFEnergy World Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CWGYF or EWCLF More Risky?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy World Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 1.644, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.41%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWGYF or EWCLF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy World Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy World Corp. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWGYF or EWCLF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Energy World Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Energy World Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.63x while Energy World Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is 102.41x versus 11.91x for Energy World Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.102.41x 53.63x -- -- EWCLFEnergy World Corp. Ltd.11.91x 0.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWGYF or FRHYF?
Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) has a net margin of -- compared to Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.63% beat Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $13.9M FRHYFFrontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWGYF or FRHYF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia), analysts believe Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 FRHYFFrontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)0 0 0 -
Is CWGYF or FRHYF More Risky?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWGYF or FRHYF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWGYF or FRHYF?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia) quarterly revenues of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)'s net income of --. Notably, Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.63x while Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)'s PE ratio is 51.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is 102.41x versus -- for Frontier Energy Ltd. (Australia). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.102.41x 53.63x -- -- FRHYFFrontier Energy Ltd. (Australia)-- 51.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWGYF or OGFGY?
Origin Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.63% beat Origin Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $13.9M OGFGYOrigin Energy Ltd.-- -- $9B -
What do Analysts Say About CWGYF or OGFGY?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Origin Energy Ltd., analysts believe Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Origin Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 OGFGYOrigin Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CWGYF or OGFGY More Risky?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.136%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWGYF or OGFGY?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Energy Ltd. pays out 55.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Energy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWGYF or OGFGY?
Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Origin Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.63x while Origin Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carnegie Clean Energy Ltd. is 102.41x versus 1.19x for Origin Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWGYFCarnegie Clean Energy Ltd.102.41x 53.63x -- -- OGFGYOrigin Energy Ltd.1.19x 13.69x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 7.35% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 47.5% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.15% over the past day.
