CRWKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Cranswick PLC's net margin of --. Cranswick PLC's return on equity of 12.82% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 19.35%.

Cranswick PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $80.66 which suggests that it could grow by 6.57%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has higher upside potential than Cranswick PLC, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is more attractive than Cranswick PLC.

Cranswick PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.809%.

Cranswick PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Cranswick PLC pays 38.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 50.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cranswick PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Cranswick PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Cranswick PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cranswick PLC is 1.01x versus 1.69x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Cranswick PLC's net margin of --. Cranswick PLC's return on equity of 12.82% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 32.7%.

Cranswick PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $134.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that Diageo PLC has higher upside potential than Cranswick PLC, analysts believe Diageo PLC is more attractive than Cranswick PLC.

Cranswick PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.176%.

Cranswick PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Cranswick PLC pays 38.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cranswick PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Cranswick PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Cranswick PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cranswick PLC is 1.01x versus 3.46x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomad Foods has a net margin of -- compared to Cranswick PLC's net margin of 9.14%. Cranswick PLC's return on equity of 12.82% beat Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58%.

Cranswick PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomad Foods has an analysts' consensus of $23.68 which suggests that it could grow by 43.35%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Cranswick PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Cranswick PLC.

Cranswick PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.787%.

Cranswick PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Nomad Foods offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cranswick PLC pays 38.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cranswick PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cranswick PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods quarterly revenues of $846.4M. Cranswick PLC's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Cranswick PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Nomad Foods's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cranswick PLC is 1.01x versus 0.81x for Nomad Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Cranswick PLC's net margin of --. Cranswick PLC's return on equity of 12.82% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.

Cranswick PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of $66.05 which suggests that it could grow by 18.19%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Cranswick PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Cranswick PLC.

Cranswick PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.558%.

Cranswick PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cranswick PLC pays 38.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cranswick PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Cranswick PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Cranswick PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cranswick PLC is 1.01x versus 2.15x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.