CRLFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 71.5%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.16x versus 21.47x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -13.37%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.72%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.14 which suggests that it could grow by 56.43%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cardinal Energy Ltd., analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cardinal Energy Ltd..

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.178%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are smaller than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.3M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.16x versus 0.24x for Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HTC Purenergy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than HTC Purenergy, Inc., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than HTC Purenergy, Inc..

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a beta of -0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.849%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. HTC Purenergy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. HTC Purenergy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than HTC Purenergy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s net income of -$88.1K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.16x versus 0.86x for HTC Purenergy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -48.93%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.15%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.16x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.