Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
55
CRLFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.59
Seasonality move
:
22.81%
Day range:
$6.55 - $6.64
52-week range:
$3.28 - $6.71
Dividend yield:
7.82%
P/E ratio:
19.46x
P/S ratio:
3.30x
P/B ratio:
1.65x
Volume:
57.4K
Avg. volume:
48.1K
1-year change:
42.56%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$363.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.34
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRLFF
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$85.4M | -- | 2.41% | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRLFF
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$6.57 | -- | $1.1B | 19.46x | $0.04 | 7.82% | 3.30x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$1.11 | -- | $11.2M | -- | $0.02 | 0% | 0.72x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$9.70 | -- | $19.9M | 41.72x | $0.00 | 0% | 22.04x |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
$0.0005 | -- | $103.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.5M | 0.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
$0.0121 | -- | $243K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRLFF
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
19.49% | 0.784 | 18.14% | 0.41x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
2.46% | 0.578 | 1.9% | 0.57x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | 35.64x |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-- | -36.127 | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
37.93% | 1.933 | 129.87% | 0.06x |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-4.01% | -0.072 | 6.04% | 0.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRLFF
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
|
$19.9M | $14.1M | 7.28% | 8.39% | 18.65% | $5.4M |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$266K | -$1.6M | -58.62% | -59.32% | -50.19% | -$622K |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$214K | $27.2K | 2.54% | 2.54% | 11.69% | $242.3K |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-$1.3K | -$13.6K | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-$130.4K | -$1.7M | -21.62% | -34.33% | -340.41% | -$121K |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-- | -$11.6K | -- | -- | -48.57% | -$3.6K |
Cardinal Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CRLFF or BRN?
Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -48.65%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.06 $795.1M BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.8.33% -$0.15 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CRLFF or BRN?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Barnwell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, Inc., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Barnwell Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.0 0 0 BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRLFF or BRN More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRLFF or BRN?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.82%. Barnwell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRLFF or BRN?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.30x versus 0.72x for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.3.30x 19.46x $75.6M $10M BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0.72x -- $3.2M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRLFF or CKX?
CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 71.5%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.06 $795.1M CKXCKX Lands, Inc.92% $0.08 $18.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CRLFF or CKX?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.0 0 0 CKXCKX Lands, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRLFF or CKX More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRLFF or CKX?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.82%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRLFF or CKX?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.30x versus 22.04x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.3.30x 19.46x $75.6M $10M CKXCKX Lands, Inc.22.04x 41.72x $232.6K $166.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRLFF or HTPRF?
HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.06 $795.1M HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CRLFF or HTPRF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HTC Purenergy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than HTC Purenergy, Inc., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than HTC Purenergy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.0 0 0 HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRLFF or HTPRF More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a beta of -0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRLFF or HTPRF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.82%. HTC Purenergy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. HTC Purenergy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRLFF or HTPRF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than HTC Purenergy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s net income of -$88.1K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.30x versus 0.86x for HTC Purenergy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.3.30x 19.46x $75.6M $10M HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.0.86x -- -- -$88.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRLFF or RHCCF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -510.34%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.06 $795.1M RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CRLFF or RHCCF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Helium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Royal Helium Ltd., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Royal Helium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.0 0 0 RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRLFF or RHCCF More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.396%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRLFF or RHCCF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.82%. Royal Helium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Helium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRLFF or RHCCF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues of $494.4K. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Royal Helium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.30x versus 0.00x for Royal Helium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.3.30x 19.46x $75.6M $10M RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRLFF or SPOWF?
Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of 13.25% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -48.93%. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.39% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.26.25% $0.06 $795.1M SPOWFStrata Power Corp.-- $0.00 -$241.7K -
What do Analysts Say About CRLFF or SPOWF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardinal Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Cardinal Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.0 0 0 SPOWFStrata Power Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CRLFF or SPOWF More Risky?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRLFF or SPOWF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.82%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardinal Energy Ltd. pays 105.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRLFF or SPOWF?
Cardinal Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are $75.6M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s net income of $10M is higher than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Cardinal Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardinal Energy Ltd. is 3.30x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRLFFCardinal Energy Ltd.3.30x 19.46x $75.6M $10M SPOWFStrata Power Corp.-- -- -- $6.3K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.94% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.12% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.82% over the past day.
