Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
38
COENF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.86
Seasonality move
:
0.49%
Day range:
$5.86 - $5.86
52-week range:
$5.11 - $5.93
Dividend yield:
4.81%
P/E ratio:
22.63x
P/S ratio:
2.71x
P/B ratio:
2.90x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2.5K
1-year change:
14.68%
Market cap:
$5.8B
Revenue:
$2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COENF
Contact Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MDDNF
Meridian Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGHTF
Mercury NZ Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$9.6B | $2.23 | 11.71% | -38.62% | $201.94 |
|
VETTF
Vector Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COENF
Contact Energy Ltd.
|
$5.86 | -- | $5.8B | 22.63x | $0.13 | 4.81% | 2.71x |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
$11.82 | -- | $13.8B | 18.24x | $0.10 | 2.12% | 0.56x |
|
MDDNF
Meridian Energy Ltd.
|
$2.84 | -- | $7.5B | 122.23x | $0.05 | 5.72% | 2.81x |
|
MGHTF
Mercury NZ Ltd.
|
$4.03 | -- | $5.7B | 110.71x | $0.09 | 4.99% | 2.87x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$152.69 | $201.94 | $33B | 39.38x | $0.48 | 1.16% | 0.99x |
|
VETTF
Vector Ltd.
|
$2.73 | -- | $2.7B | 30.99x | $0.07 | 5.52% | 4.12x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COENF
Contact Energy Ltd.
|
44.83% | -0.360 | -- | 0.46x |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
44.27% | -0.215 | -- | 1.33x |
|
MDDNF
Meridian Energy Ltd.
|
17.7% | -0.307 | -- | 0.47x |
|
MGHTF
Mercury NZ Ltd.
|
31.93% | -0.189 | -- | 0.49x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
90.82% | 3.119 | 53.68% | 1.10x |
|
VETTF
Vector Ltd.
|
37.54% | 0.152 | -- | 0.18x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COENF
Contact Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.78% | 8.35% | -- | -- |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
-- | -- | -3.37% | -5.51% | -- | -- |
|
MDDNF
Meridian Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.88% | 1.01% | -- | -- |
|
MGHTF
Mercury NZ Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.59% | 2.28% | -- | -- |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $377M | 5.92% | 38.59% | 4.86% | -$170M |
|
VETTF
Vector Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.12% | 4.94% | -- | -- |
Contact Energy Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns COENF or CPYYY?
Centrica Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Contact Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.35% beat Centrica Plc's return on equity of -5.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COENFContact Energy Ltd.-- -- $2.7B CPYYYCentrica Plc-- -- $8.7B -
What do Analysts Say About COENF or CPYYY?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Centrica Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Contact Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Centrica Plc, analysts believe Contact Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Centrica Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COENFContact Energy Ltd.0 0 0 CPYYYCentrica Plc0 0 0 -
Is COENF or CPYYY More Risky?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 101.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrica Plc has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COENF or CPYYY?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Centrica Plc offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Contact Energy Ltd. pays 105.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Contact Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COENF or CPYYY?
Contact Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Centrica Plc quarterly revenues of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Centrica Plc's net income of --. Notably, Contact Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Centrica Plc's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Contact Energy Ltd. is 2.71x versus 0.56x for Centrica Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COENFContact Energy Ltd.2.71x 22.63x -- -- CPYYYCentrica Plc0.56x 18.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COENF or MDDNF?
Meridian Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Contact Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.35% beat Meridian Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COENFContact Energy Ltd.-- -- $2.7B MDDNFMeridian Energy Ltd.-- -- $5.4B -
What do Analysts Say About COENF or MDDNF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meridian Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Contact Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Meridian Energy Ltd., analysts believe Contact Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Meridian Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COENFContact Energy Ltd.0 0 0 MDDNFMeridian Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COENF or MDDNF More Risky?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 101.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meridian Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.747%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COENF or MDDNF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Meridian Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 5.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Contact Energy Ltd. pays 105.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Meridian Energy Ltd. pays out 85.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Meridian Energy Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Contact Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COENF or MDDNF?
Contact Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Meridian Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Meridian Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Contact Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Meridian Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 122.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Contact Energy Ltd. is 2.71x versus 2.81x for Meridian Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COENFContact Energy Ltd.2.71x 22.63x -- -- MDDNFMeridian Energy Ltd.2.81x 122.23x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COENF or MGHTF?
Mercury NZ Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Contact Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.35% beat Mercury NZ Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COENFContact Energy Ltd.-- -- $2.7B MGHTFMercury NZ Ltd.-- -- $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About COENF or MGHTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mercury NZ Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Contact Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mercury NZ Ltd., analysts believe Contact Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Mercury NZ Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COENFContact Energy Ltd.0 0 0 MGHTFMercury NZ Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COENF or MGHTF More Risky?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 101.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury NZ Ltd. has a beta of 0.196, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COENF or MGHTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Mercury NZ Ltd. offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Contact Energy Ltd. pays 105.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury NZ Ltd. pays out 41699.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COENF or MGHTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mercury NZ Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Mercury NZ Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Contact Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Mercury NZ Ltd.'s PE ratio is 110.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Contact Energy Ltd. is 2.71x versus 2.87x for Mercury NZ Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COENFContact Energy Ltd.2.71x 22.63x -- -- MGHTFMercury NZ Ltd.2.87x 110.71x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COENF or NRG?
NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Contact Energy Ltd.'s net margin of 0.85%. Contact Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.35% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COENFContact Energy Ltd.-- -- $2.7B NRGNRG Energy, Inc.14.1% $0.26 $18.3B -
What do Analysts Say About COENF or NRG?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Contact Energy Ltd., analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Contact Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COENFContact Energy Ltd.0 0 0 NRGNRG Energy, Inc.11 2 1 -
Is COENF or NRG More Risky?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 101.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COENF or NRG?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Contact Energy Ltd. pays 105.4% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Contact Energy Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COENF or NRG?
Contact Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Contact Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, Contact Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Contact Energy Ltd. is 2.71x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COENFContact Energy Ltd.2.71x 22.63x -- -- NRGNRG Energy, Inc.0.99x 39.38x $7.8B $66M
-
Which has Higher Returns COENF or VETTF?
Vector Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Contact Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.35% beat Vector Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COENFContact Energy Ltd.-- -- $2.7B VETTFVector Ltd.-- -- $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About COENF or VETTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vector Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Contact Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Vector Ltd., analysts believe Contact Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Vector Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COENFContact Energy Ltd.0 0 0 VETTFVector Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COENF or VETTF More Risky?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 101.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vector Ltd. has a beta of -0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.709%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COENF or VETTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Vector Ltd. offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Contact Energy Ltd. pays 105.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Vector Ltd. pays out 153.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COENF or VETTF?
Contact Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vector Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Contact Energy Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Vector Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Contact Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Vector Ltd.'s PE ratio is 30.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Contact Energy Ltd. is 2.71x versus 4.12x for Vector Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COENFContact Energy Ltd.2.71x 22.63x -- -- VETTFVector Ltd.4.12x 30.99x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
