Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
20
CLILF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.54
Seasonality move
:
0.19%
Day range:
$1.54 - $1.54
52-week range:
$1.54 - $2.10
Dividend yield:
5.79%
P/E ratio:
23.69x
P/S ratio:
3.96x
P/B ratio:
1.05x
Volume:
35.6K
Avg. volume:
1.9K
1-year change:
-15.38%
Market cap:
$7.7B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.14
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDEVY
City Developments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.
|
$3M | -$0.02 | 1702.91% | -92.93% | $6.00 |
|
HBNB
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OMH
Ohmyhome Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $29.00 |
|
YLDGY
Yanlord Land Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Ltd.
|
$1.54 | -- | $7.7B | 23.69x | $0.09 | 5.79% | 3.96x |
|
CDEVY
City Developments Ltd.
|
$5.55 | -- | $5B | 33.74x | $0.02 | 1.5% | 1.93x |
|
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.72 | $6.00 | $102.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 15.48x |
|
HBNB
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
|
$7.07 | -- | $1.7B | 26.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 70.19x |
|
OMH
Ohmyhome Ltd.
|
$0.84 | $29.00 | $2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.33x |
|
YLDGY
Yanlord Land Group Ltd.
|
$10.50 | -- | $1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.28x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Ltd.
|
36.84% | 0.053 | -- | 1.19x |
|
CDEVY
City Developments Ltd.
|
59.43% | 0.608 | -- | 0.74x |
|
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.
|
-69.68% | -1.210 | 2.25% | 0.07x |
|
HBNB
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -2.021 | -- | -- |
|
OMH
Ohmyhome Ltd.
|
10.1% | -1.354 | 4.85% | 1.41x |
|
YLDGY
Yanlord Land Group Ltd.
|
43.55% | 0.723 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.72% | 2.85% | -- | -- |
|
CDEVY
City Developments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.93% | 2.15% | -- | -- |
|
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBNB
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OMH
Ohmyhome Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -84.63% | -93.6% | -- | -- |
|
YLDGY
Yanlord Land Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -5% | -8.18% | -- | -- |
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLILF or CDEVY?
City Developments Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.85% beat City Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.-- -- $16.4B CDEVYCity Developments Ltd.-- -- $16.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CLILF or CDEVY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand City Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than City Developments Ltd., analysts believe CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is more attractive than City Developments Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.0 0 0 CDEVYCity Developments Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CLILF or CDEVY More Risky?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison City Developments Ltd. has a beta of 0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLILF or CDEVY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. City Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. CapitaLand Investment Ltd. pays 125.92% of its earnings as a dividend. City Developments Ltd. pays out 30.94% of its earnings as a dividend. City Developments Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLILF or CDEVY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than City Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than City Developments Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while City Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is 33.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is 3.96x versus 1.93x for City Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.3.96x 23.69x -- -- CDEVYCity Developments Ltd.1.93x 33.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLILF or EUDA?
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.85% beat EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.-- -- $16.4B EUDAEUDA Health Holdings Ltd.-- -- -$3.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CLILF or EUDA?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 120.59%. Given that EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than CapitaLand Investment Ltd., analysts believe EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than CapitaLand Investment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.0 0 0 EUDAEUDA Health Holdings Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is CLILF or EUDA More Risky?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLILF or EUDA?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CapitaLand Investment Ltd. pays 125.92% of its earnings as a dividend. EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLILF or EUDA?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EUDA Health Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is 3.96x versus 15.48x for EUDA Health Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.3.96x 23.69x -- -- EUDAEUDA Health Holdings Ltd.15.48x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLILF or HBNB?
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.85% beat Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.-- -- $16.4B HBNBHotel101 Global Holdings Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLILF or HBNB?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp., analysts believe CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.0 0 0 HBNBHotel101 Global Holdings Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CLILF or HBNB More Risky?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLILF or HBNB?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CapitaLand Investment Ltd. pays 125.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLILF or HBNB?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is 3.96x versus 70.19x for Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.3.96x 23.69x -- -- HBNBHotel101 Global Holdings Corp.70.19x 26.01x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLILF or OMH?
Ohmyhome Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.85% beat Ohmyhome Ltd.'s return on equity of -93.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.-- -- $16.4B OMHOhmyhome Ltd.-- -- $5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CLILF or OMH?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ohmyhome Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3340.1%. Given that Ohmyhome Ltd. has higher upside potential than CapitaLand Investment Ltd., analysts believe Ohmyhome Ltd. is more attractive than CapitaLand Investment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.0 0 0 OMHOhmyhome Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is CLILF or OMH More Risky?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ohmyhome Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLILF or OMH?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Ohmyhome Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CapitaLand Investment Ltd. pays 125.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Ohmyhome Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLILF or OMH?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ohmyhome Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Ohmyhome Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Ohmyhome Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is 3.96x versus 0.33x for Ohmyhome Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.3.96x 23.69x -- -- OMHOhmyhome Ltd.0.33x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLILF or YLDGY?
Yanlord Land Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.85% beat Yanlord Land Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.-- -- $16.4B YLDGYYanlord Land Group Ltd.-- -- $8.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CLILF or YLDGY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yanlord Land Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Yanlord Land Group Ltd., analysts believe CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Yanlord Land Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.0 0 0 YLDGYYanlord Land Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CLILF or YLDGY More Risky?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yanlord Land Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLILF or YLDGY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.79%. Yanlord Land Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CapitaLand Investment Ltd. pays 125.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Yanlord Land Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLILF or YLDGY?
CapitaLand Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yanlord Land Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Yanlord Land Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CapitaLand Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.69x while Yanlord Land Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CapitaLand Investment Ltd. is 3.96x versus 0.28x for Yanlord Land Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLILFCapitaLand Investment Ltd.3.96x 23.69x -- -- YLDGYYanlord Land Group Ltd.0.28x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
