Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
67
CKNHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$56.44
Seasonality move
:
3.55%
Day range:
$56.44 - $56.44
52-week range:
$39.04 - $57.90
Dividend yield:
2.6%
P/E ratio:
16.36x
P/S ratio:
2.07x
P/B ratio:
2.23x
Volume:
421
Avg. volume:
374
1-year change:
8.31%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$845.1M
EPS (TTM):
$3.17
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CKNHF
Clarkson Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CKNHF
Clarkson Plc
|
$56.44 | -- | $1.7B | 16.36x | $0.45 | 2.6% | 2.07x |
|
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
|
$24.00 | -- | $703.5M | 71.43x | $0.17 | 1.02% | 2.35x |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
$117.58 | -- | $85.7B | 32.75x | $0.72 | 1.56% | 2.39x |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
$7.06 | -- | $1.9B | 30.78x | $0.04 | 1.47% | 2.99x |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
$28.32 | -- | $3.8B | 17.18x | $0.16 | 1.73% | 1.62x |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
$18.40 | -- | $153.1B | 17.72x | $0.06 | 0.74% | 6.18x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CKNHF
Clarkson Plc
|
-- | 1.454 | -- | 2.17x |
|
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
|
27.69% | 1.790 | -- | 1.18x |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
41.52% | -0.741 | -- | 0.84x |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
22.34% | 1.000 | -- | 0.64x |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
34.84% | 1.331 | -- | 0.96x |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
59.19% | 0.467 | -- | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CKNHF
Clarkson Plc
|
-- | -- | 15.53% | 15.53% | -- | -- |
|
AVNBF
Avon Technologies Plc
|
-- | -- | 2.92% | 4.09% | -- | -- |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
-- | -- | 10.11% | 17.47% | -- | -- |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 9.86% | 12.3% | -- | -- |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
-- | -- | -17% | -21.53% | -- | -- |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | 174.2% | -- | -- | -- |
Clarkson Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CKNHF or AVNBF?
Avon Technologies Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Clarkson Plc's net margin of --. Clarkson Plc's return on equity of 15.53% beat Avon Technologies Plc's return on equity of 4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CKNHFClarkson Plc-- -- $677.3M AVNBFAvon Technologies Plc-- -- $232.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CKNHF or AVNBF?
Clarkson Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avon Technologies Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarkson Plc has higher upside potential than Avon Technologies Plc, analysts believe Clarkson Plc is more attractive than Avon Technologies Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CKNHFClarkson Plc0 0 0 AVNBFAvon Technologies Plc0 0 0 -
Is CKNHF or AVNBF More Risky?
Clarkson Plc has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avon Technologies Plc has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.411%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CKNHF or AVNBF?
Clarkson Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Avon Technologies Plc offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Clarkson Plc pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Avon Technologies Plc pays out 67.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CKNHF or AVNBF?
Clarkson Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Avon Technologies Plc quarterly revenues of --. Clarkson Plc's net income of -- is lower than Avon Technologies Plc's net income of --. Notably, Clarkson Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.36x while Avon Technologies Plc's PE ratio is 71.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarkson Plc is 2.07x versus 2.35x for Avon Technologies Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CKNHFClarkson Plc2.07x 16.36x -- -- AVNBFAvon Technologies Plc2.35x 71.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CKNHF or BAESY?
BAE Systems Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Clarkson Plc's net margin of --. Clarkson Plc's return on equity of 15.53% beat BAE Systems Plc's return on equity of 17.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CKNHFClarkson Plc-- -- $677.3M BAESYBAE Systems Plc-- -- $25.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CKNHF or BAESY?
Clarkson Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BAE Systems Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarkson Plc has higher upside potential than BAE Systems Plc, analysts believe Clarkson Plc is more attractive than BAE Systems Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CKNHFClarkson Plc0 0 0 BAESYBAE Systems Plc0 0 0 -
Is CKNHF or BAESY More Risky?
Clarkson Plc has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BAE Systems Plc has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.386%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CKNHF or BAESY?
Clarkson Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. BAE Systems Plc offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Clarkson Plc pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. BAE Systems Plc pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CKNHF or BAESY?
Clarkson Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BAE Systems Plc quarterly revenues of --. Clarkson Plc's net income of -- is lower than BAE Systems Plc's net income of --. Notably, Clarkson Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.36x while BAE Systems Plc's PE ratio is 32.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarkson Plc is 2.07x versus 2.39x for BAE Systems Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CKNHFClarkson Plc2.07x 16.36x -- -- BAESYBAE Systems Plc2.39x 32.75x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CKNHF or CMGMY?
Chemring Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Clarkson Plc's net margin of --. Clarkson Plc's return on equity of 15.53% beat Chemring Group Plc's return on equity of 12.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CKNHFClarkson Plc-- -- $677.3M CMGMYChemring Group Plc-- -- $608.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CKNHF or CMGMY?
Clarkson Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chemring Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarkson Plc has higher upside potential than Chemring Group Plc, analysts believe Clarkson Plc is more attractive than Chemring Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CKNHFClarkson Plc0 0 0 CMGMYChemring Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is CKNHF or CMGMY More Risky?
Clarkson Plc has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chemring Group Plc has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.405%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CKNHF or CMGMY?
Clarkson Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Chemring Group Plc offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Clarkson Plc pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Chemring Group Plc pays out 43.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CKNHF or CMGMY?
Clarkson Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chemring Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. Clarkson Plc's net income of -- is lower than Chemring Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, Clarkson Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.36x while Chemring Group Plc's PE ratio is 30.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarkson Plc is 2.07x versus 2.99x for Chemring Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CKNHFClarkson Plc2.07x 16.36x -- -- CMGMYChemring Group Plc2.99x 30.78x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CKNHF or QNTQY?
QinetiQ Group plc has a net margin of -- compared to Clarkson Plc's net margin of --. Clarkson Plc's return on equity of 15.53% beat QinetiQ Group plc's return on equity of -21.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CKNHFClarkson Plc-- -- $677.3M QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc-- -- $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CKNHF or QNTQY?
Clarkson Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand QinetiQ Group plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarkson Plc has higher upside potential than QinetiQ Group plc, analysts believe Clarkson Plc is more attractive than QinetiQ Group plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CKNHFClarkson Plc0 0 0 QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc0 0 0 -
Is CKNHF or QNTQY More Risky?
Clarkson Plc has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QinetiQ Group plc has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.665%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CKNHF or QNTQY?
Clarkson Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. QinetiQ Group plc offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Clarkson Plc pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. QinetiQ Group plc pays out 25.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CKNHF or QNTQY?
Clarkson Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than QinetiQ Group plc quarterly revenues of --. Clarkson Plc's net income of -- is lower than QinetiQ Group plc's net income of --. Notably, Clarkson Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.36x while QinetiQ Group plc's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarkson Plc is 2.07x versus 1.62x for QinetiQ Group plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CKNHFClarkson Plc2.07x 16.36x -- -- QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc1.62x 17.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CKNHF or RYCEY?
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Clarkson Plc's net margin of --. Clarkson Plc's return on equity of 15.53% beat Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CKNHFClarkson Plc-- -- $677.3M RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CKNHF or RYCEY?
Clarkson Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarkson Plc has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, analysts believe Clarkson Plc is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CKNHFClarkson Plc0 0 0 RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc0 0 0 -
Is CKNHF or RYCEY More Risky?
Clarkson Plc has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.338% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CKNHF or RYCEY?
Clarkson Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Clarkson Plc pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clarkson Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CKNHF or RYCEY?
Clarkson Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of --. Clarkson Plc's net income of -- is lower than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of --. Notably, Clarkson Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.36x while Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarkson Plc is 2.07x versus 6.18x for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CKNHFClarkson Plc2.07x 16.36x -- -- RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc6.18x 17.72x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
