CINGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net margin of 19.82%. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.24% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 70.85%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $280.71 which suggests that it could grow by 13.73%. Given that Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has higher upside potential than Coinsilium Group Ltd., analysts believe Automatic Data Processing, Inc. is more attractive than Coinsilium Group Ltd..

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a beta of 3.306, which suggesting that the stock is 230.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.15%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Coinsilium Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coinsilium Group Ltd. is 63.81x versus 4.73x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net margin of 18.5%. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.24% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $365.58 which suggests that it could grow by 44.57%. Given that Autodesk, Inc. has higher upside potential than Coinsilium Group Ltd., analysts believe Autodesk, Inc. is more attractive than Coinsilium Group Ltd..

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a beta of 3.306, which suggesting that the stock is 230.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.461, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.142%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coinsilium Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coinsilium Group Ltd. is 63.81x versus 7.94x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net margin of -7.71%. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.24% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 374.76%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Coinsilium Group Ltd., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Coinsilium Group Ltd..

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a beta of 3.306, which suggesting that the stock is 230.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.024%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coinsilium Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coinsilium Group Ltd. is 63.81x versus 1.65x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paysafe Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net margin of -20.21%. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.24% beat Paysafe Ltd.'s return on equity of -14.96%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paysafe Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.90 which suggests that it could grow by 29.74%. Given that Paysafe Ltd. has higher upside potential than Coinsilium Group Ltd., analysts believe Paysafe Ltd. is more attractive than Coinsilium Group Ltd..

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a beta of 3.306, which suggesting that the stock is 230.587% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paysafe Ltd. has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.817%.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paysafe Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coinsilium Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paysafe Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coinsilium Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paysafe Ltd. quarterly revenues of $433.8M. Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Paysafe Ltd.'s net income of -$87.7M. Notably, Coinsilium Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paysafe Ltd.'s PE ratio is 35.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coinsilium Group Ltd. is 63.81x versus 0.24x for Paysafe Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.