CICOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of 0.04%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 103.13%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.58x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.85x versus 0.43x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -37.51%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 57.5%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.58x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.85x versus 20.70x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1285.08%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.363, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.58x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.85x versus 0.06x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.