Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
84
CHOWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.70
Seasonality move
:
2.69%
Day range:
$1.70 - $1.70
52-week range:
$0.56 - $1.70
Dividend yield:
4.31%
P/E ratio:
7.54x
P/S ratio:
0.43x
P/B ratio:
0.50x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
54.36%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$2.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.23
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHOWF
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JMG
Journal Media Group Inc. Commo
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $0.09 | 8.77% | 42.63% | $10.92 |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHOWF
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.
|
$1.70 | -- | $1.1B | 7.54x | $0.03 | 4.31% | 0.43x |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.
|
$16.56 | -- | $16.3B | 21.71x | $0.28 | 4.17% | 1.44x |
|
JMG
Journal Media Group Inc. Commo
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
$4.00 | -- | $57.2M | 0.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 30.54x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$8.01 | $10.92 | $3.1B | 30.47x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.64x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
$3.32 | -- | $38.2M | 83.17x | $0.20 | 24.1% | 0.93x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHOWF
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.
|
28.8% | 1.222 | -- | 0.53x |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.
|
42.7% | -0.594 | -- | 0.24x |
|
JMG
Journal Media Group Inc. Commo
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | 1.878 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
120.74% | 2.067 | 193.76% | 1.00x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
7.65% | 0.351 | 4.21% | 2.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHOWF
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.76% | 6.58% | -- | -- |
|
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 11.29% | 22.05% | -- | -- |
|
JMG
Journal Media Group Inc. Commo
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$375.8M | $192.2M | 0.91% | -- | 14.66% | -- |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
$7M | -$495K | -0.35% | -0.38% | -5.22% | $70K |
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHOWF or CJEWY?
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.58% beat Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.-- -- $2.2B CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.-- -- $6.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CHOWF or CJEWY?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd., analysts believe Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is more attractive than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0 0 0 CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHOWF or CJEWY More Risky?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a beta of 0.033, which suggesting that the stock is 96.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.219, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.078%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHOWF or CJEWY?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. pays 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. pays out 74.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHOWF or CJEWY?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is 0.43x versus 1.44x for Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0.43x 7.54x -- -- CJEWYChow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd.1.44x 21.71x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHOWF or JMG?
Journal Media Group Inc. Commo has a net margin of -- compared to Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.58% beat Journal Media Group Inc. Commo's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.-- -- $2.2B JMGJournal Media Group Inc. Commo-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CHOWF or JMG?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Journal Media Group Inc. Commo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has higher upside potential than Journal Media Group Inc. Commo, analysts believe Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is more attractive than Journal Media Group Inc. Commo.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0 0 0 JMGJournal Media Group Inc. Commo0 0 0 -
Is CHOWF or JMG More Risky?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a beta of 0.033, which suggesting that the stock is 96.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Journal Media Group Inc. Commo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHOWF or JMG?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Journal Media Group Inc. Commo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. pays 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Journal Media Group Inc. Commo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHOWF or JMG?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Journal Media Group Inc. Commo quarterly revenues of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Journal Media Group Inc. Commo's net income of --. Notably, Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Journal Media Group Inc. Commo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is 0.43x versus -- for Journal Media Group Inc. Commo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0.43x 7.54x -- -- JMGJournal Media Group Inc. Commo-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHOWF or MI?
NFT Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.58% beat NFT Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.-- -- $2.2B MINFT Ltd.-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CHOWF or MI?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has higher upside potential than NFT Ltd., analysts believe Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is more attractive than NFT Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0 0 0 MINFT Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHOWF or MI More Risky?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a beta of 0.033, which suggesting that the stock is 96.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT Ltd. has a beta of 3.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 288.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHOWF or MI?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. NFT Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. pays 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHOWF or MI?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NFT Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NFT Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while NFT Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is 0.43x versus 30.54x for NFT Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0.43x 7.54x -- -- MINFT Ltd.30.54x 0.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHOWF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net margin of 4.74%. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.58% beat Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.-- -- $2.2B MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.28.66% $0.19 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CHOWF or MLCO?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.92 which suggests that it could grow by 36.3%. Given that Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd., analysts believe Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. is more attractive than Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.6 4 0 -
Is CHOWF or MLCO More Risky?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a beta of 0.033, which suggesting that the stock is 96.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.922%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHOWF or MLCO?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. pays 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHOWF or MLCO?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 30.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is 0.43x versus 0.64x for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0.43x 7.54x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.0.64x 30.47x $1.3B $62.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHOWF or NHTC?
Natural Health Trends Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net margin of -4.55%. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.58% beat Natural Health Trends Corp.'s return on equity of -0.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.-- -- $2.2B NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.73.43% -$0.04 $28.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CHOWF or NHTC?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Health Trends Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 803.62%. Given that Natural Health Trends Corp. has higher upside potential than Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd., analysts believe Natural Health Trends Corp. is more attractive than Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0 0 0 NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CHOWF or NHTC More Risky?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a beta of 0.033, which suggesting that the stock is 96.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends Corp. has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHOWF or NHTC?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Natural Health Trends Corp. offers a yield of 24.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. pays 42.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends Corp. pays out 1606.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHOWF or NHTC?
Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Natural Health Trends Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.5M. Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Natural Health Trends Corp.'s net income of -$431K. Notably, Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Natural Health Trends Corp.'s PE ratio is 83.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. is 0.43x versus 0.93x for Natural Health Trends Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHOWFChow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd.0.43x 7.54x -- -- NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.0.93x 83.17x $9.5M -$431K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
